this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
288 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We will need small and independent commercial providers for the Fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Community is enough. The Fediverse allows for small servers that do not cost a lot to run.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Due to the lack of economies of scale, they cost more per user than centralized alternative. Either we will have thousands of people who don't mind footing the bill of the free riders, or we all will have to pay our share.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's true, thousands of cheap instances will add up, and probably to something bigger than what a server farm would have. Unless we start hosting something heavier than text extensively I expect the bill per user is still going to be tiny, though.

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's definitely the first one. Very unlikely things have any reason to shift to an all paid model. Even still the cost of a single user is almost negligible. The cost to support thousands of those "free riders" is still probably on the order of dollars.