this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
416 points (95.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43918 readers
1905 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Companies like Intuit aka Quicken pay large sums of money to not only access banking API's but also lobby heavily to keep them closed source. They also make sure that other access to the same API's come at a higher rate so that competitiors will pay more for access or support when things break. Its why theres very few alternatives and of what alternatives there is either generally requires you to setup your own export/import system for transactions or is backed by huge sums of VC (ie: Mint, which is also now owned by intuit).

Similar to how companies like TaxAct or TurboTax (another Intuit brand) lobby heavily to make tax filing overcomplicated and confusing AF so they can sell tax filing services. Even getting to the free file is purposefully designed to push to you pay some company 350 bucks to tell the government what you made (which they already know and tell you in your tax filing).

Basically banks and merchants (or more accurately their processing systems used by banks and made by companies like Jack Henry, FIS etc) are in co-hoots to avoid progress and keep their walled guarden closed.

[–] johnlobo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s a general term used to denote that two companies of the same/very similar sectors are in bed with each other with an arrangement that is exclusive and specifically designed to keep outsiders out

[–] cujo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I have never heard the word used that way before. Thank you for the clarification.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think it’s shorthand for “buddy-buddy.”

Like they’re keeping it in the family and not letting any outsiders in.