this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
47 points (92.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5189 readers
360 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
47
Gas appliances’ days are numbered in California (www.politico.com)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7 to c/climate
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The regulator tasked with managing air quality in [California’s] South Coast basin — a massive region that crosses four counties and is home to 17 million people — voted on Friday to phase out gas-powered commercial ovens that companies like Frito-Lay and Bimbo use to pump out large quantities of chips, bread and tortillas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 year ago

I actually agree on all of that in principle. The problem I have with the headline is that it takes what's supposedly a by the book article about a positive choice by the government and pretends that it's another episode in one of the stupidest astroturfed causes celebre currently engaging the far right echochamber and that's REALLY saying something!

I guarantee that a sub-editor in charge of headlines was told to bring more readers/clicks by courting controversy and proceeded to do so with all the subtlety and competence of clearing the table after dinner with a flamethrower.