this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
111 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59298 readers
4871 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
111
California just opened the floodgates for self-driving cars (www.washingtonpost.com)
submitted 1 year ago by holo_nexus@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
72 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In a pivotal moment for the autonomous transportation industry, California chose to expand one of the biggest test cases for the technology.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] bron@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While it is exciting, I can see both sides of the argument here. The infrastructure here in the US is built around cars so it would be much less effort to automate the existing infrastructure. On the other hand, things could be so much more efficient if we focused on trains and other public transport that excels at transporting a large amount of people. But that would take so much more effort and money to update the infrastructure.

[โ€“] Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why not do both? They aren't mutually exclusive. I feel strongly for reasons I've outlined that one has much more potential than another, but I'm not anti public transport. I think we need to invest heavily though where the most potential lies.