this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
7 points (64.0% liked)
World News
32326 readers
426 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And also in carbon emissions, which they produce more than double the next highest country.
Carbon emissions in China are far lower per capita than pretty much anywhere in the west, and that's including the fact that much of the stuff people in the west consume is manufactured in China.
Wind power per capita would put China far lower than the west.
Why would you lie about something that can be easily googled? https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/china-widens-renewable-energy-supply-lead-with-wind-power-push-2023-03-01/
Blatantly false. China produces far more energy than the rest of the world so of course it produces more wind energy—but again, not per capita: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/wind-electricity-per-capita?tab=table
Note that Denmark, for example, produces 6 times the wind power per capita as does China. It’s not particularly close.
Denmark is a tiny part of the west population wise. Compare all of western countries combined and the picture is very different. Again, why would you engage in such blatant cherry picking to misrepresent things?
I just picked the top one to show how far they are from being in the lead, which is what you claimed. If you actually look at the link I posted, you will see that almost every Western nation is ahead of China, even laggards like the US.
That would be like me picking a tiny village in China to make a point. What I claimed is that China is far ahead of the west, and you jumped in with a straw man. I've already provided you lots of sources showing that China is ahead of the west by every conceivable measure when it comes to renewables, feel free to go read them.
I did read them but none of your links show that at all. I have to wonder if you read them. Some of them are quite informative as to just how bad their current policies are. I will work on a longer rebuttal to your long post later but I need to get back to work.
If you actually read them then you know what you're saying here is a lie. The links show that less than half of power production in China comes from fossils today, that china dominates in production and deployment of renewables as well as nuclear, and that China is doing massive reforestation. If you're claiming these policies are bad, then what does that say about the rest of the world.
If you compare the sum of all Western countries together then China loses on both total and per capital so I don't see what your point is. Per your own numbers above, even.
Not sure per what numbers you're claiming that to be the case to be honest. Certainly not based on the ones I posted above.