Asklemmy

43741 readers

1865 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

352

How many of you are using ChatGpt to help you with your work, and not telling your boss/co-workers? (aussie.zone)

submitted 1 year ago by dbilitated@aussie.zone to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

173 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just out of curiosity. I have no moral stance on it, if a tool works for you I'm definitely not judging anyone for using it. Do whatever you can to get your work done!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Echo71Niner@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I concur. ChatGPT is, in fact, not an AI; rather, it operates as a predictive text tool. This is the reason behind the numerous errors it tends to generate and its lack of self-review prior to generating responses is clearest indication of it not being an AI. You can identify instances where CHATGPT provides incorrect information, you correct it, and within 5 seconds of asking again, it repeat the same inaccurate information in its response.

[–] rbhfd@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's definitely not artificial general intelligence, but it's for sure AI.

None of the criteria you mentioned are needed for it be labeled as AI. Definition from Oxford Libraries:

the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks normally requiring human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and translation between languages.

It definitely fits in this category. It is being used in ways that previously, customer support or a domain expert was needed to talk to. Yes, it makes mistakes, but so do humans. And even if talking to a human would still be better, it's still a useful AI tool, even if it's not flawless yet.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It just seems to me that by this definition, the moment we figure out how to do something with a computer, it ceases to be AI because it no longer requires human intelligence to accomplish.

[–] jamesravey@lemmy.nopro.be 8 points 1 year ago

As Larry Tesler once said "AI is whatever hasn't been done yet."

[–] Applejuicy@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

I guess the word "normally" takes care of that. It implies a situation outside of the program in question.