this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
268 points (91.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26753 readers
1849 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Was reminded how Epstien not killing himself was/is so accepted yet it’s still a conspiracy theory. Is there any similar ones you guys believe to be completely true ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brainfreeze@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Whoa, this is one I haven't come across. What is it?

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Basically the internet is made of primarily bot accounts interacting with each other and the majority of content online is not people interacting with people.

It’s a gross oversimplification of the theory, but I’m of the same mind. We’re getting really close to it.

[–] haych@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago
[–] echoplex21@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is my Lemmy client busted or the parent comment is about Lee Harvey Oswald

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see dead internet theory

Might be your app (or it could be mine)

[–] echoplex21@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah it looks good to me now. That was weird (bots are out to get me lol)

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 3 points 1 year ago

The true conspiracy is always in the comments, friend.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Small specialized cases of this have already been happening for nigh-on decades at this point (yes, the internet really is that old).

This article from 2014 describes the process of automated arbitrage in some detail, which was already happening back then:

http://www.dansdata.com/gz146.htm

In summary, some web retailer somewhere runs a bot to buy an item from someone else, mark it up, and resell it. When poorly managed, a bot run by one vendor winds up trying to pull stock from a bot from other vendor doing the same thing, and then that vendor tries to the pull-and-markup scheme on the first vendor. The net result is both bots getting into an infinite circular markup loop trying to buy the same item (which doesn't exist) from each other at an increasingly insane price. This only continues because no living person actually notices.

[–] McNasty@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All your online interactions are with bots.

Brought to you by Carl's Jr.

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] McNasty@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I love that someone explained unironically.

[–] ZetaLightning94@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I know, that the next part of the quote.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We half way there lol