this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
21 points (81.8% liked)

politics

18883 readers
4155 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The 37-year-old biotech entrepreneur turned Republican presidential candidate has been steadily garnering support in a party dominated by conservative Christians. In many polls, he’s in third place behind former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, and he is one of six candidates who have qualified for the first GOP presidential debate on Aug. 23.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t trust entrepreneurs because capitalism, in my opinion, is pure greed. Taking more than you need.

I don’t trust people who believe in God because putting your faith in an imaginary friend in the sky is the most out of touch concept ever. There is nothing out there to save you. Be good or bad, because its the way you feel, not because the cloud man will approve or disapprove.

I wouldn’t call my feelings hate, just a lack of apathy. People are free to have the same or differing opinions from my own. They don’t need to respect my beliefs and I don’t need to respect theirs.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t trust entrepreneurs because capitalism, in my opinion, is pure greed.

Have you ever went to a local breakfast restaurant?

Taking more than you need.

Do you take more than you need?

I don’t trust people who believe in God because putting your faith in an imaginary friend in the sky is the most out of touch concept ever.

Most out of touch concept that almost every society in history has believed in? God takes different avenues in everyones lives, if we sat down, had some tea and discussed, I'm sure I could find where you put God in your life.

There is nothing out there to save you.

I've been saved by something out there, so I disagree. I think you knowing that nothing is out there is more absurd than someone believing there might be.

Be good or bad, because its the way you feel, not because the cloud man will approve or disapprove.

You abide by many christian morals, so what's 'good' v 'bad' is affecting by the God you hate so much.

People are free to have the same or differing opinions from my own. They don’t need to respect my beliefs and I don’t need to respect theirs.

I agree, but the difference is I don't think less of people trying to start businesses, or people with different beliefs than me.

[–] 108@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just to point out a lot of the morals were in place before christianity arrived.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Western society has been morally shaped overwhelmingly, for better or for worse, by Christianity of at least the last 1500 years.

Do you dispute that?

[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why do you keep using the word ‘hate’ so much? If I distrust someone because the thing they believe is not rooted in reality, you label it as hate.

In facts I would say that your disdain and vigor to label someone with ‘hate’ is pointing to your own hate towards others.

And the fact that humans have felt a need to create religion upon religion is perhaps because of the lack of understanding the world and nature around them. Fear of death is a huge driver to create an afterlife and death affects all of mankind, so it is logical to see it create religion on all levels over the planet.

I find your attitude towards people who air their opinion rather toxic tbh.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The individual said he doesn't trust anyone who believes in God. His statements later about God made it apparent he hates him.

I think it's telling that you defend someone who hates others for having a different beliefs than them, but you rant at me because I call him out on it.

[–] argues_semantics@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He doesn’t hate your god. He just doesn’t give a shit about him. Truthfully, agnostics/atheists are hardly thinking about god ever, if at all.

People are free to believe in what they want to believe in. Religion and spirituality, after all, is just our way of understanding ourselves. The problem is when people choose to impose their religion on others. In politics, this exists in the form of policy-making based on your religious doctrine.

You mentioned morality is based on Christianity but that isn’t true at all. There are some obvious moral truths that have existed time immemorial — don’t kill, don’t steal, don’t cheat. There’s plenty of examples in history to the contrary, but even more to support these shared values across all cultures.

At the end of the day, people really just want to be treated kindly. So, they should give kindness in the way they would like it themselves.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

>He just doesn’t give a shit about him.

Weird, because he went out of his way to bring in God into the conversation and said anyone that believes in him he doesn't trust.

[–] argues_semantics@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it really going out of your way when that’s the topic of this post, theism in politics?

It doesn’t belong. That I agree with. Being against entrepreneurship is a bit of a hot take though.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

>Is it really going out of your way when that’s the topic of this post, theism in politics?

Saying you don't trust anyone that believes in a God, yeah, it is going out of your way.

>Being against entrepreneurship is a bit of a hot take though.

Incredibly stupid and indefensible, you mean.