this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
387 points (89.6% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
5145 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Any ex-Tesla employees willing to take up an offer? 😜

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Motavader@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Perhaps he's forgotten that free speech means you're free to say whatever you want, but you're not free from the repercussions. Especially in all the "at will" employee states.

This is so stupid.

[–] mindbleach@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"At will" is pure conservative bullshit, right down to the name being a lie that makes "fired for illegal reasons but wink wink doesn't count" harmful to even discuss.

No relation to Musk's stupidity. Just picking a nit.

[–] Motavader@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's exactly what I mean. Employees in At Will states can legally be fired for anything short of violations of protected classes, so I'm not sure how he's expecting to win here.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Musk’s philosophy is apparently: if it’s not okay to fire someone for being trans, a woman or for their race, why is it okay to fire someone for being anti-trans, misogynistic or racist?

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it's on the fired employee to prove it was because of those protected reasons and be able to fight it after the fact in court.

That goes for every other state also soooo...?

[–] el_cordoba@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Stupid? Definitely. A play out of Trump's playbook? Kinda. Normally Trump is the one that gets sued.

They will probably look to get small to mid size employers to settle in order to avoid a costly legal battles. Although I wouldn't be surprised if this is all just a ploy to keep his fanboys in line.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

He has never faced any consequences for anything. He didn't forget that, it's never applied to him.

[–] 007v2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Forgot? He never knew.

[–] Lord_McAlister@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

He knows exactly what free speech means. But now he releases he may be able to make more money if people didn't have it.