this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
270 points (99.6% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29042 readers
2 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Apparently there's an issue with some instances banning users for criticizing authoritarian governments. Is lemmy.world a safe place to criticize governments?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] thoro@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If the comment was about "black people causing the most crime in the US", would you think it's worth listening to? Something having citations and being written in a "civil" tone does not necessarily mean it's high level discourse.

Some people hear dog whistles. Some don't.

[โ€“] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the comment was about "black people causing the most crime in the US", would you think it's worth listening to?

If they had facts and hard data to back it up, it would at least be worth discussing.

The problem is too many have opinions based on feelings, and feelings are not stable or permanent ... they can change from moment to moment, hour by hour and day by day.

Something having citations and being written in a "civil" tone does not necessarily mean it's high level discourse.

In your opinion ... unless you have facts/data to back that up.

[โ€“] thoro@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

A statistic can be factual and tell a misleading or incorrect story. A study can be flawed or one could say x and be shared while another says y and is ignored. And these can all be used together to push

...opinions. Often this can be employed to push opinions that a consensus of people determine is harmful.

This is an Internet forum not a debate hall, so people are in no way owed to be rhetorically dueled with a riposte of links and citations.

If a community decides it's not a place to debate the merit of trans people existing and being accepted (or any other topic), it has that right.