this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)
World News
32286 readers
830 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
and
good luck clearing those charges without experts.
He will likely cry mistrial
I think that is an actual threat if he can't find an expert. The judge might assign someone if he can't find one himself just to avoid that.
Can you envision being on that candidate list for random selection? It's a form of career ending Russian roulette or watching the Vietnam draft on TV. People know if you're drafted it's not your fault, but being thrown into an impossible situation where just being involved might put you in jail like many of the lawyers who came before you into that role ...
Having your number come up would be really tough.
Meh. Lawyers represent unsavory clients all the time. I think Trump's treatment of his lawyers is the issue for most. Using them as political spokespersons and his reputation of not paying.
My guess is it'll go like this:
Trump: Judge, I can't find a lawyer with the skills to represent me.
Judge: Give me the list of people you tried to get to represent you.
The judge looks over the list see someone they knows.
Judge: Mr. X is appointed to Trump's lawyer team and will be paid 1.2 x [standard rate]. Trump will put Y amount into escrow to ensure payment.
Add some rules about what exactly the appointed lawyer will do and done. Trump can't argue for improper representation later.
I think there's a huge personal risk to the lawyers too.
If Trump doesn't like how this lawyer is representing him, he can sic his angry mob on the lawyer.
Just to clarify, his previous lawyers went to jail for lying to courts on behalf of Trump or providing Trump with advice on how to get away with crimes. Defending Trump doesn't automatically get you in trouble.
with how he has treated his lawyers in the past, and the publicity this will get, if it came to that I think the appointee would come out no worse off. It's very clear he sabotages his defenders.
But maybe he just chooses to represent himself if it comes to that.
Who knew that having a reputation for being hard to work with and stiffing people would make it harder to get people to work for you?