this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
90 points (96.9% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
622 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://fpcc.ca/stories/updated-bc-sans-font-now-available/

BC Sans 2.0 supports typing in the 34 First Nations languages of B.C.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

This is admittedly off-topic, but the hardcore descriptivist in me can't help but speak out. Feel free to ignore!

"Font" is widely colloquially accepted as a synonym for "typeface". I'd wager that for most people (outside of graphic designers or technologically-inclined folk), "font" is more likely to be understood than "typeface". What is the purpose of language if not communicating ideas? Being understood is, for me at least, more important than pedantic correctness.

Plus, language evolves, just as humans do. If it didn't, we'd have reserved "typeface" as a word for the design of cast or engraved blocks used in printing. Would you agree with a prescriptivist saying we shouldn't use the word "typeface" in computing, since the text is made from pixels and not a block stamping ink?

Thanks all for coming to my TED Talk.