this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
306 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Experts say Ottawa is playing more of a role in housing, which is mostly a provincial and territorial responsibility, but federal involvement hasn't brought much relief amid rising home prices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fresh@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Historically, past housing crises have been resolved with massive input from the federal government. I hope this government acts with urgency, people are suffering out there, but given that the last housing minister was literally a housing investor I'm not very hopeful. I think only the NDP has the right alignment of interest and values.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

By building medium density, transit oriented, neighborhoods; the feds can get after housing, environmental, and cost of living issues at the same time. Get three birds stoned at one.

If provinces fight it, give the housing to another province.

[–] nueonetwo@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

God I wish this would happen. The BCNDP are actually making substantial changes to our legislation but its not enough without major investments into transit infrastructure. Rail corridors need to be reopened/established and active transit projects need to be heavily subsidized.

Heavily subsidized?

It obviously varies wildly, but a road can cost $1,500k per lane km (NS highway planning figure). A multiuse path costs $10k per km (City of Toronto). That's 150:1 ratio.

And that's just construction, path maintenance is basically just snow clearance, roads are expensive; though maintenance data varies incredibly wildly based on how it's annualized and traffic volume.

Make every lane km of road built require the construction of 0.5km of path. Sure, construction costs increase 0.3%, but I'd wager the reduction in car use would see that recovered in maintenance costs (personal guess, not data driven).

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But that's all municipal and to some degree, provincial.

What the feds need to do is curb immigration for a while until we figure this out and also create legislation for the realtor business/profession or just make it obsolete. Why the fuck do we need these dweebs when we can just simplify the process instead. There would be no more incentive from those bastards to blow up prices and give bad advice to people for a bigger commission.

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Immigration isn't driving the housing crisis, though. Real estate speculation and short-term rentals are.

Massively tax short-term rentals and non-primary-resident housing and watch the problem go away

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Immigration doesn't help. We let a million people into the country last year and only built 250k housing units.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Here's another report that says it's an important factor.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/2211653

[–] PaganDude@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It's not driving the crisis, but it's making it a lot worse.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's all within the mandate of CMHC, they have used the tools to achieve this before.

Housing plans. Municipal planning. Housing construction. Planned, self-contained, communities. Housing quality improvement. Urban renewal. Density enforcement. Non-profit low income housing.

These are all things CMHC has done in the past, and can do again in the future.

Curbing immigration may help housing, but I don't know what the impacts to that on the labour for are. We're already in a labour crunch and using foreign workers.

Realtors are one I hadn't thought of. They should go the way of travel agencies, or be replaced by non-profits of there is something about them I'm missing.

[–] PaganDude@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I keep hearing about this labour crunch, and yet as someone who builds houses as a job (carpenter) this is the slowest summer since 2020 for building houses in Alberta. The builders only seem to want to build pre-purchashed houses and have limited the "spec" houses they build and sell later. It's the same for a lot of friends we have in the industry, people are scrambling to find work, not workers.

And I've been putting out resumes to nearby industries & not getting much attention. So really, how much is there a real labour shortage, and where? Because the 4th & 5th biggest cities in the country aren't doing so well.

Industries 62, 72, and 81 are all above 6% vacancy.

Construction had 64k vacancies last quarter, 12k of those in Alberta.

I get it, it sucks when the jobs aren't where you want to live, I've moved my family 6 times (in 15 years) for work, it's harder every time.