this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
191 points (83.0% liked)

World News

32290 readers
577 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Viewers are divided over whether the film should have shown Japanese victims of the weapon created by physicist Robert Oppenheimer. Experts say it's complicated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] SilentStorms@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have not seen the film yet, but it seems like this is a biopic about Oppenheimer, not a WWII movie.

Also, do directors need to infantilize their audience by directly showing "this was bad. Here is why this was bad"? Like, obviously the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were devastating. If you have basic history knowledge you should already know that, and know that those bombings were a direct consequence from what was depicted in the movie with out it being spelled out for you.

[โ€“] Alto@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

The movie is more about the political witchhunt after the fact than it is directly about the bomb itself