this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
33 points (90.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43898 readers
1197 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Jaamulberry@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I see this as a big issue for content going forward. I get that reddit is one single point of failure but I wonder how you can keep knowledge in a static state when most instances lose money and it's a hobby. What happens when the owner grows tired.

[โ€“] peter@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

Could also be an issue from a data privacy perspective. If I want to delete comments I left, but the instance I made them on has shut down how can I delete them?

[โ€“] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How often do you revisit forum posts you made in 2007? Some content doesn't need to be preserved

[โ€“] Jaamulberry@beehaw.org 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's not about visiting a forum post I made in 2007. It's about visiting a forum post about an obscure issue that someone solved in 2007.

[โ€“] milkisklim@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Wahots@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago

This is so stupidly relevant to strange motherboard problems. I hope that lemmy is able to be scraped by web crawlers to help assist with these sorts of problems in the future.

[โ€“] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That part won't change. If your current instance was federated with an obscure community/instance before that community/instance disappeared, then you will still have the content from back then and will be able to find the discussion and solution

[โ€“] Jaamulberry@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if my instance never interacted with that instance?

[โ€“] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well no, but then you weren't going to find it anyway, even if the other instance was still around

[โ€“] Jaamulberry@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would argue the instance still gets indexed by Google and if it was around I could Google search for the result.

[โ€“] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Ok, but in that instance, unless that niche instance that disappeared never federated with anyone, then their content is going to be available on the instances they did federate with before they went away, and those will continue to show in google

[โ€“] capacitor@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

It would certainly be nice to replace stack overflow with a good Lemmy instance, but have the data guaranteed to remain around.

[โ€“] squaresinger@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

That still works with replication. What won't work is having any discussion going forward be replicated over all replications. But the replication works fine for archival purpouses.

[โ€“] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perhaps each client should keep data. Something like a blockchain, with redundant copies stored on clients and clients using some consensus protocol to agree on what the real history is.

[โ€“] squaresinger@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Blockchain is the worst possible solution for this. There are much better versions of this.

Also, no need for clients to keep gigabytes or even terrabytes of data. That's what you have instances for.