this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
691 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59340 readers
5442 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a_new_sad_me@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In a world where remotes are scarce, I could see how this would be a concern, yes.

[–] Legendsofanus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Where remotes are scarce? What do you mean by that, are you talking about the time when they came in or now

[–] joby@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

They were talking about the device from the article, when a non-wired remote was a new and neat idea. Also, standardized, long-lasting batteries may not have been as common as we're used to these days.

That's the world where the original engineers decided not to go with an electronic device, so they didn't have customers buying the bleeding edge tech and thinking it had bricked a couple of months after purchase because "did you change the battery?" wasn't a consideration they were used to yet

[–] a_new_sad_me@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

When the remote controls were first invented.