this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
147 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43866 readers
1808 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Gotta love how sugar is never on the list of things to avoid.

[โ€“] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sugar industry pays big money to blame everything else while they dump sugar in EVERYTHING

even bread is sweet

A lot of people I know think that sugar is required to make bread (to activate yeast). Sugar is not at all required.

[โ€“] danie10@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Anything with a "Foundation" or a "Board of" behind it, seems to get lobbying rights to veto any changes, i.e. to preserve their status quo ;-)

Supposedly too, you used to be able to commission a "research project" and define it's scope nice and narrow, and get just the results you'd like to have published to support the "no change". It does take a lot of money to be able to do this, though.