this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
23 points (67.7% liked)

World News

32286 readers
1076 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Kinda redundant to say "electrocuted to death "

[–] toastio@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Could have just been injured. Electrocution doesn't always mean death.

According to Miriam-Webster, the definition of electrocuted is:

to kill or severely injure by electric shock

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It did until people kept misusing it like this.

It's a combination of electricity and execution. If you survived you were just shocked. If you died you were electrocuted.

[–] toastio@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting. I never knew that about it's etymology.

I just looked it up quickly and it seems to be way more nuanced than that. According to at least one article, it was used prior to the first electrical execution in 1899 as a means of referring to a non-fatal shock.

https://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/wc/electrocution-a-shocking-misuse/

Either way, I think it's splitting hairs. It's common and acceptable usage anymore to use that term meaning a non-fatal shock. So the clarification in the title doesn't come across as redundant to me.

[–] dave@feddit.uk -2 points 1 year ago

Just because people have been wrong since 1899, it doesn’t mean we should put up with it.

It’s becoming, as they say, a big of a problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)