this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
710 points (98.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6461 readers
1154 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mewtwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 110 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

There's definitely other life out there, but given a basic understanding of space and light speed travel, there is a zero chance we've made contact with non Earth life. The government has a direct benefit in claiming aliens or UFOs when testing their super military tech so our enemies are mislead on our militaries capabilities.

Like when trump posted a classified satellite image. Our population and all other governments had no idea we were capable of such clear satellite surveillance.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

On the contrary, I'd recommend looking up the Fermi paradox. It exists because if we assume that ftl is impossible, both in a literal and effective sense, a civilization with the capability of long-range subluminal travel would still have the ability to colonize the galaxy within a few million years.

Now, you might be tempted to think, "okay, so a few million years from now is when we'll start seeing them", but that's assuming they took as long as we did to evolve intelligence. If I'm not mistaken, there's some speculation that dinosaurs were a significant contributor to delaying the rise of mammals, and those were around for over 100 million years. What if a civilization skipped the "oppressed by giant lizard-birds" stage? The result is that they'd potentially be millions of years ahead of us technologically.

Also, because I regularly see this question pop up in any conversation involving aliens,

"why would they come to our world? They've probably got everything they want!"

Why does a human want to explore the ocean? Why does a human want to explore space? Curiosity. Maybe they want to see it for themselves instead of looking at pictures that their friends posted on Spacebook. Maybe we're small and adorable to them. There are plenty of reasons why they might check our world out that don't involve conquest, genocide, slavery or other symptoms of rampant capitalism and authoritarianism.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why would they send a probe to inspect ships from a visible distance? They could fulfill all their curiosity from lightyears away

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dandelo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Fermi Paradox is based on our understanding of physics, largely based in a 3 dimensional universe/reality. If these things are inter-dimensional, do those same rules apply?

What if physical distance, as we perceive it, is something unique to us as beings that perceive and navigate the universe in only 3 dimensions?

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Swarms of von Neumann probes traveling at 0.1c would cover the galaxy in a very short timeframe...in galactic terms.

It also makes zero sense to test craft in a navy training range.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

What would the point of that be? Just because something is possible doesn't mean it'll be done.

And do probes flying around in navy training ranges make sense? If they wanted to be visible they would be. If they wanted to hide there wouldn't be footage of them.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

its kind of neet because soon we will liter the galaxy and then we wait

[–] CoffeeBlood91@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I still vote we are some sort of experiment for aliens to observe, and have been under the microscope as they watched us evolve from primal creatures to the death of the world as we advance with our destructive technologies.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One thing that doesn't sit right with me is the fact that galaxies cluster together in similar ways that neurons do. Reminds me of how individual ants are just one cog in a collective hivemind. We're all just ants doing our part to power a giant alien's brain.

At least that's the answer to life, the universe, and everything that I'm going with. It also explains multiverses. Multiple aliens, all living in their own society. Maybe their universe is the same. Just brains inside of brains inside of brains. Who knows how deep it goes.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Galaxy's cluster together because of dark matter, all the baryon matter in the universe follows the dark matter which for some reason forms thise strings.

Go watch some PBS spacetime for more info... And a headache.

[–] sockinacock@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Personally my money's on we're one of the first, or our solar system is the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone of the galaxy and anybody who gets too close melts.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The government has a direct benefit in claiming aliens or UFOs when testing their super military tech so our enemies are mislead on our militaries capabilities.

They technically are UFOs. They are objects, they fly, and they are unidentified.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're not really unidentified. Someone knows what they are, just not us.

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

That logic would apply to alien spaceships too though

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

there is a zero chance we've made contact with non Earth life

Yeah! Because heavier than air flight is impossible, and there's no way aliens could hold enough helium to fly to another planet!

(Our ideas about what is possible change as our technology advances)

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

People tend to misapply this argument frequently. It is definitely a bit excessive to say there is zero chance, but still.

It's less about what is possible, and more about what is likely. Our understanding of physics (and by extension, reality) is extremely advanced. There isn't much that is going to surprise us going forward. Even relativity and quantum theory didn't make Newtonian mechanics obsolete, they simply covered the fringe cases.

I just hate when people imply that we might suddenly learn that we were completely wrong about everything. It's dismissive of the scientists who have given their lives to bring humanity to this level of understanding the universe.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think when people imply we might suddenly learn that we were completely wrong about everything they are actually talking about how fast science seems to evolve these days, at the very least the public's understanding of science.

I have coworkers with who i can talk about 3+ dimensions, quantum mechanics, time travel, uap and while none of us are experts in any of those fields it no longer feels like we should be wearing a tinfoil hat simply for being fascinated by such topics because we now understand these are real (nuanced) scientific topics and not "something from the movies".

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ufology, at least what we saw in Congress recently, is not remotely in the same boat as quantum, higher level dimensions, or time travel in terms of being a real scientific topic.

The other stuff I've all heard discussed seriously by actual non crackpot employed physicists.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who’s to say that? The people testifying said themselves they are open minded to these other explanations, they coined the terms higher dimensional and quantum mechanics.

At this point with what we know a uap can be super Secret human tech. A propaganda lie, Aliens, an, hidden advanced intelligence co existing on our planet. A 4d dimensional something going trough our space, timetravelers,.. there is nothing scientific said about their nature or theyd be identifief objects.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I think I must be completely missing what you're trying to say.

Quantum mechanics came out of conversations related to Planck's proposed resolution of the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, the term was not just coined by a crackpot in a Congressional hearing.

[–] corq@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's okay to be 'wrong' in science within the observable world, much of Newton's theories were rendered nearly obsolete by Einstein, but Newtonian physics was "good enough" until technology improved, and was "good enough" for most of his generation and later:

"While general relativity has been more precise, Newtonian gravity is still incredibly accurate and can be used for simpler situations. General relativity uses complex calculus that makes it difficult to compute. But Einstein has opened up the world to more complex physics, like black holes and gravitational waves that continue to develop our understanding of the universe. " https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/educators/programs/cosmictimes/educators/workshops/docs/InquiringIntoNatureUniverse/Newton_Einstein_FactCards.pdf

Epistemology allows for us to work within the framework of knowledge we currently have until something better is proven to be the case.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It's happened before

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, cutting edge science currently suggests spacetime is an illusion, so I think antireal science might have some interesting places to go as far as FTL travel. But we don't need FTL travel to talk to new forms of life, because there are sentient nonhuman species on Earth, and they speak English.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who taught dolphins English ?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

They've been singing about how grateful they are for all the fish.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If an alien civilization was developed by the same survival mechanism as on earth, they'd value survival and expansion over things like discovery. So if an alien civilization had gotten to earth, it'd be advanced enough to have strip minded or taraformed the whole planet by now. And why wouldn't they, since we'd be the intelligence of ants comparatively

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why would they strip mine earth when there are so many other planets around? There's no point

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well I'm a Star Trek fan, and I'm optimistic that maybe the community between the stars is less narrow minded than the people on Earth today

Maybe climate change is the reason why. It's a great filter that requires long term thinking and global cooperation to overcome. Maybe all the species similar to modern humanity end up polluting themselves back to the stone age and have to try again.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It’s probably not the only Filter either. As soon as we’ve passed the ‘climate’ filter, we’ll presumably have to deal with something else.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still believe that the image being posted was 100% planned by the powers to be to show we have the ability to do it.

[–] LeadSoldier@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the intelligence field this is known as a bad move.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

In the intelligence field the game is usually about obfuscation and distraction.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

bruh you can use an old DishNetwork and a cyberdeck to download those satellites images directly from the comfort of your home. also wierd satellite stationz

secrecy by obscurity of knowledge i believe it is called

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

From classified spy satellites? No shot. Unclassified stuff maybe, or civilian satellites. But anything military and/or classified is going to be encrypted, so unless you know the key you may be able to intercept the data but not make an image.

[–] loklan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, you can get images from weather satellites this way, they broadcast unencrypted/with old encryption that has been broken.

Ain't nobody getting a feed from a modern GIS sat, let alone an actual spy sat.

[–] Saracha@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you have any links for this? That sounds fascinating but my Google fu is failing me right now.

[–] loklan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Check out r/amateursatellites/ on reddit (sorry, I'm a refugee and unaware if similar exists in the fediverse yet), there are whole communities of people out there who listen to weather sats with antennas in their backyards, it's fascinating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (5 replies)