this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
158 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37730 readers
760 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rainh@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lol I doubt it. LLMs are useless for the kinds of questions stack overflow is useful for.

[–] fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And no SO means worse LLMs. Chatgpt relies on scrapes of SO, reddit, forums and GitHub discussion pages.

[–] arthur@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And the scrapping stage already happened. A new one will be useful only after enough human-made content is added, or it a major change in tech happen.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

It's not like ChatGPT is the only LLM. GPT is pretty broad and general. Remember that MS has Co-Pilot which is literally entirely built on GitHub's codebase knowledge. Different data sets will produce different kinds of useful predictors.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I've had great success with LLMs troubleshooting my code independently without needing to consult a peer.

It's easier than looking on StackOverflow because it already crawled the answers there and it's been programmed to drop the sass unless you ask it to be sassy specifically. All the knowledge without the elitism.