this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
48 points (92.9% liked)

Asklemmy

44151 readers
1542 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I would pay for a retro gaming subscription that would give me access to over 1,000 games for $20 a month. Sega Genesis, Atari, Nintendo, Neo-Geo and so much more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I’d say I go to see a movie in an actual movie theater once a year, but the truth is I probably go half as often as that.

It isn’t that I am not interested in movies, I just don’t see the value. I am supposed to pay for a ticket, concessions, and whatever goes into travel to the theater to watch a movie with a bunch of (probably annoying) strangers in a fairly gross environment?

My guess is my annual box office contribution is approximately 0.5x the current ticket price.

If, however, there was a $20/month subscription service which would let me watch new releases at home, I would subscribe.

Even if it was relegated to expensive hardware, like an Apple Vision Pro, I would very likely buy the device and sign up for the subscription.

$240/year would be a hell of a lot more revenue than my current $5.50/year—regardless of whether or not it would be exclusive to certain hardware or platforms.

Honestly, my current TV and sound system may not be as impressive as a theater, but they are good and I’d take that experience over the modified bus depot experience of a public movie theater.

[–] bradboimler@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

If, however, there was a $20/month subscription service which would let me watch new releases at home, I would subscribe.

I wish there was a way to pay a one time fee (per release) to watch new releases as much as I want forever. Without downloading a damn app for each one.

[–] strawberry@kbin.earth 6 points 2 days ago

don't get consession, just bring a water and call it good

then tickets are then $10-15, at least in that USA, that's easily justifiable to me once a month or so

[–] Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 days ago

You speak some truth here. I've been meaning hard to try and go out to movie theaters. I just keep ending up not going. Like, I know I'm missing out on the experience of seeing things on a gigantic screen at the comfort of a chair. I know I'm missing out on the latest and greatest. But it's the expensive concessions and the experience of hearing many sounds coming from people as the movie itself tries drowning out that waters it down for me. Not to mention having to travel to the theater and pay the rising ticket prices just for the negatives.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 0 points 2 days ago

Man, I would never get a subscription for the Apple Vision / HP Reverb G2

Tbh, even if Valve offered one I don't think I would... I'm sure it would be the most fair subscription service out there, but I just don't think I could get on board.