this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
384 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5373 readers
941 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mke@programming.dev 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Don't worry, cheaper solar panels, electric cars and entrepreneurs will save humanity. And by humanity I mean a specific share of the world's developed nations. Discourse on this frustrates me to an unhealthy degree.

If you promote techno-fetishism laden, borderline tech-bro driven or shitass bill gates financed media, please reply so I may wish upon your remaining bloodline an everlasting mildly inconvenient curse.

And if you like Kurzgesagt tech videos, please reply so I may respectfully call you a fucking donkey.

[–] hexabs@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

What's that about kurzgesagt?

I often found good citations/ research evidence linked to their claims (on climate change)

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 0 points 1 hour ago

They list their sources! Their content tends to be pretty well done, even if not perfect.

[–] theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They repeat whatever their donors claim without any checking on their part. Sometimes this lines up with science, sometimes it's just propaganda.

[–] hexabs@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Any example videos that are propoganda?

I'd like to scrutinize one so I can fact check better in the future. I mainly check the citations in the links.