this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
406 points (95.1% liked)

World News

32290 readers
505 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agree about "legal being not the same as moral or ethical", but calling for mob justice just isn't something I would root for. The system isn't perfect, of course, but one has to trust that people sitting in court have had access to more evidence than the randos of the internet, that, and the fact that everyone should be considered innocent until proven guilty.

[–] Fisk400@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

everyone should be considered innocent until proven guilty.

Yes, absolutely. But the thing is that a lot of things are proven during trials that are immoral but not illegal. He could still have done a ton of indefensible stuff that makes him a bad person but still get a not guilty verdict. My point is that "Not being a criminal" is the lowest tier we should judge a person. If we are going to give a person a large amount of money and influence we are allowed to ask for more.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

Yep, I get the sentiment, but it's up to us to make amoral things illegal by means of democratic representation (assuming you live in a democratic country). It's just slower, but that's kind of the whole point of this :)