this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
65 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37717 readers
482 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't want to visit that place anymore - could you please copy and paste the post here?
The point of this post is actually to get people to participate over there to stop the spread of misinformation, i'd appreciate it if you went over there with an adblocker, but if you insist:
I think there's a team of people intentionally spreading lemmy misinformation. I think reddit is trying to get people not to switch from this platform
People are saying the same things everywhere, but on any analysis, they don't actually make sense, let me give an example:
There's no aspect of truth to this comment, as an example, let's try actually doing what they're saying is too hard:
https://beehaw.org
click "communities"
search "news"
oh, there's the one at the top with the most subscribers
https://beehaw.org/c/news
Done
So, did they just make up that it was too convoluted for normal people? Yes. Is there some truth to the notion that there are multiple communities for the same thing... Also yes, but there are on reddit too, it's no different than r/art and r/art1 r/art2 and the billion other subreddits in a similar position. People just search and then use the largest one... so is it an actual problem, or is it just grasping at straws? You be the judge of that.
Are there things that make lemmy difficult? Yes, but they're rapidly being solved and extremely minimal, other than that issue tracker, the other thing that might stop you is that some lemmy instances require a message and approve signup, this is because they widely aren't monetized and are run by volunteers with no intention of ever monetizing. Neither of these things are real blockers to normal human adoption, and neither of them are long-term fundamental issues.
If you think federation is too complex for normal users, I ask you, why does email face no such difficulty? Why is nobody complaining about how difficult email is because of federation?
The other issue is genuinely a problem, the lemmy developers are tankies... however, lemmy is released under an open source license, none of their ideology is being injected into the code, and this is akin to worrying about the ideology of the developers of email. Use an instance not created by them, and you're safe from this entirely, I recommend https://beehaw.org/
Don't let the misinformation factory stress you, I don't have proof that reddit is doing this on purpose, but this seems to be a common set of lies... and if you don't like lemmy anyway, there's also kbin, which federates with lemmy but is made by completely separate developers.
Federation is NECESSARY for a non-corpo/government propaganda AND control ridden future. If reddit were federated, nobody would give a fuck about this api thing, because we'd just go to another instance, and all of our content would still be available on that other instance. That's why reddit fears federation, none of the issues with lemmy are fundamental, let's build a better future, one where we don't have to hope a benevolent centralized monopoly/dictatorship on a community will work for us!
And lemmy is the only way to save these precious reddit apps: https://github.com/derivator/tafkars/tree/main/tafkars-lemmy
It's the same rhetoric as the apple guy used to show sideloading in such light as it would rob your grandma by its own.
undefined> i’d appreciate it if you went over there
Please don't. At least not until the 15th if you must. Personally I'll continue to avoid it.
I don't think it's an issue if you're using an adblocker and promoting a competitor.
It is. We want their usage stats to show that users are objecting to their plans rather than just mods and app developers.
If you manage to get at least one additional person off the platform, then it's worth it.
If you manage to get two, it's very worth it.
If you get none, then yes, you've wasted your time, but it's not that hard to convince at least one person.
It’s not about wasting time and it’s not about trying to get users to come over to Lemmy today or tomorrow.
It’s about whether you contribute to the protest or not. If you log in to Reddit and start writing comments then you’ll be flagged as an active user for that day and will lessen the impact a small amount. If many did it as you’re suggesting we should then that will lessen the impact of the protest more.
It is. And how did you type that in a millisecond?
140 wpm baby
Gosh, I felt like I was going to make this post, albeit not from a username titled "communist" 😅 .
Now, I always implore anyone who'll lend an ear - please, hold your horses on labeling devs as "tankies". Let's not instantly stamp them good or bad. Rather, let's mull over the behavior of a community that decides its course of action based on whether it's supposedly tainted by a particular ideology. Try to think of the bigger picture of how people act as a whole based on information and what those actions benefit.
Let's level with each other here. The GPL? It's got more than a dash of Marx, if you ask my humble self (and heck, I think that's a good thing). But has that deterred folks from assembling magnificent creations under the banner of a collective project? So, where do we end up if we tread down this logical path? Do we forsake Open Source software, just because its bedrock principles share a striking resemblance with Socialism/Communism? Is this selective ideological litmus test the norm now? And what fuels this selective disposition?
Now, just imagine, if I were a bigwig at a deep-pocketed corporation, wouldn't it be a walk in the park to sow the conspiracy that ALL Lemmy devs are rabid tankies (ALL of them, seriously? If I pitch in, does that make me a hardened communist?). Couple this with the palpable fear that Reddit might just bulldoze their way to victory, and voila, you've got a fearful, active amygdala ready to perceive an "enemy" - no matter how illogical. Outrage, my dear friends, is among the most contagious of emotions. Curiously enough, this entire conspiracy/misinformation hinges on just that - unbridled outrage.
It's almost as if there's no call for outrage, provided one possesses even a smidgen of understanding about open source development, its inherent messiness, and the swirling ideologies around it. Now, those are the nuggets worth pondering. But, who am I to say, right?
The problem with tankies has nothing to do with communism, i'm a communist, that's not the problem at all.
The problem with tankies is that they're authoritarian genocide deniers. The GPL doesn't have any authoritarianism or genocide denial in it.
The LEAD DEV denies the genocide Uyghurs in china. It's much worse than you're assuming.
Yeah! Definitely, I understand that! But in my neck of the woods "tankies" are more just boogeymen that people throw around when they want to cast an entire group as immoral. It's not that they don't exist, but they aren't gaining power either. It just seems like an appeal to fear (a reasonable one at that), but using illogical framing that doesn't at all represent reality. That's the fundemental crux of it for me. It may come to bite me in the future too! Growing up in conservative parts in the U.S. I've grown numb to people claiming others are communists - it comes across as more a technique for division than any real concern of community harm.
I'm not trying be an apologist for the devs opinions or detract from them as much as I'm trying to state that open source, and this project - given its git history - doesn't appear to spread authoritarianism. I didn't sign an agreement to violently seize the means of production upon cloning the repository. Had this information not been swirling around on reddit (and now lemmy) I would've never known that I had to "cancel" yet another thing.
I mean, personally, I'd rather fork it and make it into a vision that the people of Tucson want in their social media experience. Lemmy is a bit better architected, and I think the codebase is a bit more mature for such thing.
Yes, I agree that lemmy doesn't have any politics injected into the code, and that's why i'm on lemmy, but the devs are definitely politically fucked up.
I think this is a pretty good neutral intro.
That font is going to be terrible for dyslexics, though.
See from my own neck of the woods, 'tankies' describes something with actual power, albeit very minor and entirely online. I've seen a shocking amount of online leftist communities infiltrated and taken over by them, with real earnest critiques about housing prices and wealth inequality diluted by worship of whichever anti-US dictator has caught their attention today. They'll suck all the air out of the room, ban dissenters as 'libs', and then using the excuse "No Punching Left" remove criticisms of their weird ass views about Kim Jong-un and Putin.
I get that this might not be a widespread usage, but in left leaning online spaces it's a useful descriptor just because it keeps fucking happening and it actively shits up whichever community it happens to. I wish they were fucking boogeymen, honestly.
The fear, I guess, is that given how many there already are in lemmy (I guess including the devs? yeesh), they might pre-emptively poison the well in some way.
Yeah, that tracks. I'll grant you that there are those left spaces on reddit that can get really tankie really quickly. (I don't go to the ones in the fediverse - might eventually lurk tho with a critical mind of course).
I just find myself dismissing them pretty easily and making my own space. Left politics got really weird and counterproductive, so I found /r/TraumaAndPolitics and made that a small space that had some pretty interesting leftist conversation through a language of trauma. (I had made /r/TraumaInformedPolicy, but only found /r/TraumaAndPolitics a few days later, but we made the subs around the same time, oddly enough).
I suppose I shouldn't dismiss the experiences of those who stayed at the expense of authoritarian communist propaganda and have likely been damaged in some way because of it.
It's just that I find this fear counterproductive when it comes to building communities, if we're betting that most people aren't going to like Authoritarian Communisim (and that's a damn good bet) then the idea is to get as many people into the community as possible as fast as possible.
I have some on-the-ground ideas that I'll experiment with for tucson.social and report back when we see how that works.
As a person who hasn't really looked up the issue(I mean I have read about it on the net here n there, but have never dived into the issue deeply), I have seen people talking about it on both sides and I'm confused.
The main things I'm hearing from people who say that a genocide isn't happening are:
Most of the times I've seen it, both sides accuse each other of being blinded by propaganda and the convo devolves there.
Which side is actually right here?
To challenge some of your replies, if those are welcome.
People do actually complain about email, quite often. Spam filters and deliverability are real challenges sometimes. Email also has a lot of gotchas that you can run into - like what happens when you lose control of a domain name? What happens if your email provider shuts down? Who actually owns the email - you or the provider? A lot of email protocol has inherent security and privacy issues too. I don't know if I'd use email as the leading example. Phone networks or text messages might be a little more straightforward.
I also don't think it's entirely true that federation is strictly necessary. Wikimedia seems to run a lot of centralized services with large scale and large community with no federation. Tildes is a valid alternative to both Lemmy instances and Reddit with no federation. If Tildes for example went in a bad direction or became corrupted - it is open source. You could just start a new Tildes using the same source code. It isn't federated, but does it have to be?
Very few of these things are something that normal everyday email users have to deal with with any regularity, I work in IT and while the windows outlook client does have a lot of issues, no such problems exist if you use gmail, or any of the common email providers, really.
Yes, it absolutely does have to be, because federation means that the community isn't tied to any particular instance. Wikipedia is great right now, but what if somebody else takes over wikipedia, then we're simply screwed, they have complete control over the platform, we can't just stop using wikipedia and get the same content elsewhere, because that's simply not possible without federation. Especially on profit-driven websites, this is an impossible issue to solve without federation.
Yes, we could start a new tildes... but without ANY OF THE CONTENT, nobody would switch unless there was a massive reason to, it would take a massive feat of community organization to switch.
Whereas on a federated system, if you switched to another instance, you'd lose literally nothing.
These problems do exist for normal people. If you violate Google terms of service across any Google service for example you will lose access to your @gmail.com account with no recourse. Email services that aren't run by a megacorp shutdown all the time. In this list of Gmail alternatives posted on Mashable from 2007 over 50% are no longer in business.
With email most people have three options:
This requires more technical knowledge than the average person has and comes with risks and deliverability issues.
You could use service like ProtonMail or Fastmail - but these companies are far more likely to go out of business compared to something like Apple or Google.
This comes with privacy and control concerns. If you aren't paying for Gmail - you are being monetized in some other way.
From a privacy perspective this sounds like a feature to me, not a bug. I don't necessarily want my content to live in perpetuity. I regularly delete my Reddit comments and posts after a few weeks. I delete my all my social media accounts entirely every two years. Tildes going down and being replaced with a new instance and fresh content is not a problem for me.
Different values I guess.
Yet nearly everyone has an email, and nobody is suggesting we centralize it, because that would be a significantly worse experience for everyone. All of the issues you complain about would also exist in a centralized instance, especially the "use a megacorporation" one, are you suggesting reddit isn't a megacorporation? If megacorps still work as options on federated instances, then that still means federation is a net positive, EVEN IF they're the only ones that can make it work reliably, it's still better that they're all stuck competing. You'll notice, gmail doesn't suck.
Why on earth do you expect your data to be private on a public forum?
Do you not know about archive.org?
Even on reddit, they EXIST to sell your data, privacy is completely nonexistent on public forums, and it never will be, you're essentially asking users to trust in a benevolent dictatorship on their data.
If that's something you truly care about, you should be self-hosting, not pretending that what you're doing is somehow secure because you delete your data, do you honestly think reddit deletes your data? How do you know tildes does? You have no idea, because you couldn't control it even if you wanted to.
People are actively migrating to centralized communication platforms away from email. Pretty much every messaging application or chat service with mass adoption at the moment is centralized.
I am not suggesting anything, just saying that I don't know if email is a great example of federation without issues. I think it's important to be transparent about the downsides of federation as part of the discussion.
There is a difference between expecting something to be private on the internet, and the application you are using respecting your privacy. Archive.org is not run by Lemmy - it is a third party outside of our ability to control. Lemmy can control how it handles deleted and edited content within it's system. I don't like how Lemmy handles deleted content for example. I think a delete should be a delete - it should be gone, or anonymized within Lemmy specifically.
I have not made that argument. There is also nothing, as far as I can see, that would prevent the owner of a Lemmy instance (or a fork of the Lemmy software) from doing anything you list here. The software license allows for commercial use and doesn't seem to include any mandates for how instance maintainers interact with user data.
You're forgetting that you're comparing to reddit.
Matrix is catching on and growing rapidly for a reason. Also, email is still widely used in offices for a reason, have you ever had a job that didn't send you emails? I haven't. Have you ever had a job that didn't utilize emails heavily? I haven't.
You're right, reddit does the same thing, though. You can host your own lemmy instance, and then you'll be in control of the data. On any other platform, you have no choice beyond trusting the benevolent dictatorship.
If anything that's a reason to fight for federation, not a reason to fight against it.
Every company I've worked with in the past five years is communicating primarily through Microsoft Teams, Zoom, or Slack. Email is typically reserved for meeting invites or communication outside of the company. I run a team of software engineers and we probably use email less than once a month outside of accepting or declining meeting invites. I do hope Matrix catches on and continues to grow.
To follow along with this argument though, if companies wanted federation - wouldn't they run their own email servers internally instead of outsourcing that out to Microsoft or Google? I don't think I've worked with a company in the last decade that ran it's own mail servers.
Do you actually control your data if you host your own Lemmy instance? What's stopping another Lemmy instances from caching, storing, or using the data for it's own purposes?
Again, I'm not against federation, I'm literally on Lemmy right now. I'm on Mastodon too. I think federation has benefits. It's important to be honest and transparent about the pros and cons.
I literally have never worked with a company that didn't use their own email server, I don't know what you're talking about.
Nothing, but you not caring about that contradicts your argument of not caring about archive.org, that'd still be an external server downloading your data, it's no different.
I don't think there are any cons EXCEPT that developing a federated option is more complicated, but there are no cons for end-users, all of the cons you listed have much bigger equivalents problems for centralized services.
You've never worked with a company using Google Workspace or Office 365/Exchange Online?
How Lemmy instances interact is a function of the Lemmy software and federation. Archive.org is not federated with a Lemmy instance. It's literally scraping content and saving a local copy of it. This isn't preventable without requiring a login to view any content.
I just can't agree with this. My parents are going to understand how to use Twitter and how Twitter works much faster than they'd be able to figure out how Mastodon works. They'd also be able to figure out how Tildes or Reddit works faster than Lemmy.
https://join-lemmy.org/ for example has a distinctly technical first aesthetic. The first page talks about "selfhosted" and has a screenshot of a code example and the technology it is built with. The page appears geared towards software engineers. When you navigate to the join a server page it's got a broken page for sopuli.xyz, it lists random user counts, etc...
This isn't impossible for a non-technical user to understand, but it does have a higher hurdle for understanding compared to traditional centralized services.
The federation concepts are first and foremost in the presentation, instead of the user experience.
One of the companies i've worked for does use exchange, actually, my bad, I forgot it was exchange because it was on their domain.
If it's not preventable, why do you care if lemmy does it? Does this actually matter at all?
Why do you expect privacy on a public forum? You're assuming something that's impossible to get, reddit doesn't give you privacy, tildes doesn't give you privacy, you don't know that your content is actually being deleted their either, again, you're forgetting that you're comparing lemmy to something, not an imagined perfect choice.
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2977 also lemmy does delete your shit if you delete your account. So, this really is a non-issue.
Why do you assume they need to know how it works in order to use it?
Do they need to know how email works in order to use it? This is a wrong assumption. Yes, centralized services are easier to explain how they work fundamentally, but if you told someone lemmy was centralized, what incorrect assumptions would the end user actually make to actually impact their experience? Virtually nothing, once the issue trackers for instance-agnostic linking and automatically staying on your federated instance are resolved.
Are you really going to use the nothing to hide argument? I care because we should design software to respect privacy. What Lemmy does with user data is within the span of control of Lemmy. Lemmy should treat user data with respect and value user privacy to the extent it doesn't break the fundamental usage of the product.
Lemmy is open source. Tildes is open source. I know what both of them do, in theory, when I click the delete button. I know that Lemmy doesn't actually delete the post. Reddit is closed source - I edit and then delete my posts there. You are correct, I don't know what happens after that. I'm not arguing in favor of Reddit.
I don't expect privacy, but I want privacy. I use Signal for messaging for privacy. I use a smaller third party email provider for privacy. If Lemmy can be more verifiably respectful of privacy I think that will draw more users into the platform over time.
I don't even know how to respond to this. Why does someone need to know how something works to use it?
Here is the flow for Reddit:
< 5 clicks
Here is the flow for Lemmy:
This process forces the user to make more choices (probably uninformed choices) and requires more navigation.
The join-lemmy page should probably be centered around non-technical users with an emphasis on joining and instance (not hosting one). Hosting an instance should be towards the bottom of the page. It should explain the benefits in plain and easy to understand text.
No, because lemmy ISN'T PRIVATE FUNDAMENTALLY, it's a PUBLIC FORUM I do not know what else needs to be said, don't post public things if you want privacy.
You have no way of knowing what tildes actually does, you just know what the code on github says it does, unless you're running tildes yourself, you have no way of knowing.
https://docs.tildes.net/policies/privacy-policy
"If you delete a post, it is marked for deletion and hidden from the site, but the contents are not deleted immediately. The content of deleted posts is removed from our databases 30 days after deletion."
This is not a fundamental issue, this is a growing pain, and it's solved by just linking somebody to an instance instead of explaining all of that, this is opt-in complexity, not a fundamental problem.
Yeah, that would be better, or you can just link non-technical users instances and explain none of that.
A public form doesn't mean it can't respect privacy. Why even allow delete at all in Lemmy if this is your argument? Make comments immutable. It would be easier to code.
Lemmy is also aware of your IP address - should it make that information available since it's a public form? Of course not, that would be absurd. When I click delete the post should be deleted because that aligns with what the user would expect to happen.
Yep, but that's also true for pretty much all Lemmy instances including the one you use - right? You have to place some level of trust in the maintainers and administrators.
I think the way Tildes handles deleted posts (removed 30 days later) is a benefit when compared to how Lemmy handles deleted posts. I'm fine if the delete isn't instant.
I agree that it isn't a fundamental issue, but it does seem to be a reoccurring issue in federated software. The process for getting people onto the software tends to be focused on tech savvy people. That's why a lot of these platforms end up dominated by IT/software developers.
That requires 'recruiting' someone to a specific instance instead of them finding it on their own. That's not an organic process. Nobody recruited me into Reddit - I found it myself.
If I Google Lemmy my top three links are:
None of these are specific instance someone could join. There isn't a single instance in the first page of results. There are some variations of words that I can use that direct me to lemmy.ml first, but the signup page for that instance literally asks you to go to joinlemmy before signing up.
We need to improve this process if we want people to continue migrating to federated services.
It respects your privacy just as much as the alternative, which again, is reddit.
If you edit your post, the previous version isn't saved.
You are posting on a public website, you can't expect that level of privacy, nothing ever gets deleted on the internet.
The alternative isn't Reddit. It's Tildes, Lobste.rs, Lemmy forks, etc...
News aggregation isn't a binary choice with Reddit on one side. I think if you are saying your software/platform "respects privacy as much as Reddit" that should really be a red or yellow flag. The way Reddit treats user data shouldn't really be an aspiration.
I haven't dived into how Lemmy handles edits specifically yet, but my understanding is that a version of the edit is saved into a log. This also brings up the point - if I can edit my post with a period to "delete" it, why doesn't the delete work that way too?
I didn't say I expected it. I said I wanted it. Just because Twitter is terrible for privacy doesn't mean Lemmy can't aspire to better than Reddit or Twitter for privacy.
You can do that, and delete doesn't work that way in case you want to restore your post.
You can also, again, delete your account, and that will remove all of your posts.
This respects privacy, and is convenient.
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2977 I recommend actually checking the issue tracker for that.
I just disagree. Let me restore my post for a limited amount of time before hard deleting it. Make the policy around that data transparent.
I have checked the issue tracker. Privacy concerns are coming up pretty regularly there. Other people seem to value it too. Lemmy has an opportunity to set a new standard around user privacy in this space and I hope we can take that opportunity.
Post it to the issue tracker, it seems like it just hasn't been updated with that functionality yet, not that they won't do it.
My intention is to be a contributor. Rust is my second favorite language. Thank you for the discussion.
I can't imagine they'd reject a pull request for such a thing.