this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
223 points (84.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5370 readers
900 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

While I support not eating meat, I am also realistic and reducing is good enough.

No, we gotta completely uproot the animal agriculture industry if we want to save the planet and no “regenerative farming cattle” still uses too much land/water and has bovines abused and slaughtered for nothing.

https://veganuary.com/try-vegan/

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Okay, then I might as well just keep eating as much meat as I do now though? If we have to be perfect and most people aren't going to be perfect, there's no point in even trying.

Or maybe get off your high horse, accept that humanity isn't perfect, and try to get people to eat less meat first, then worry about getting them to eat no meat at all. 50% of people doing 70% of what they should is more useful than 10% doing 100%.

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a straw-man fallacy. Just because you're trying doesn't mean you have to be perfect right away.

I also believe that we have all reason to go completely vegan long-term. Thanks to food-science, it's not a radical shift anymore, just a slow adjustment and a little bit of discipline until you've adapted that new habit. I was a very much into meat and slowly adapted to a vegan diet, it get's easier over time until a point (for me at least) that you even prefer the vegan/vegetarian option.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

I agree, but the other commenter specifically was saying that it's a case of do or do not, there is no try.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Well okay then.

If my only options are, "Continue eating all the meat you want and the planet is fucked."

...or, "Stop eating all meat and go completely vegan...and the planet is still fucked unless everyone else does it too."

Well...

... fire up that grill, man, I've got some steaks and burgers in the freezer.

God, seeing the comments from some people that I'm even nominally on the "same side of the aisle" makes me see how the other side finds it so easy to not only ridicule, but automatically unite in opposition against it.

Like, nothing brings me closer to being understanding and sympathetic to the people I'd normally be ideologically set totally against...like visiting Lemmy and seeing the shit flowing from the people I broadly tend to align with.