this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
667 points (100.0% liked)

196

16552 readers
2521 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

ALT TEXT:

  • Panel 1: A person with the text "Singular 'they'" written on them smiling with open arms.
  • Panel 2: "Singular 'They'" beaten up by others who said, "Singular they is ungrammatical. It's too confusing," "How can anyone use plural pronouns for singular," and "Every pronoun should only have one purpose."
  • Panel 3: "You" hiding from the mob who was beating "Singular 'They'"
  • Panel 4: "German 'Sie'" hiding with even more fear next to "You"
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BitSound@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, I thought your question was asked in good faith. I'm commenting because the claim that Shakespeare used singular they to refer to a known, specific individual is factually incorrect. I don't know the entire history of singular they, but I do have access to wikipedia just like you. It says 'In the early 21st century, use of singular they with known individuals emerged for people who do not identify as male or female, as in, for example, "This is my friend, Jay. I met them at work."' Does that answer your question?

[–] Platomus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that isn't the only use case of "them" being singular.

And it's embarrassing for you that you don't know that.

[–] BitSound@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, I quoted a bit from the whole-ass Wikipedia page on Singular they in my response to you. I'm aware that there's multiple usages, and have said as much in my replies to you. I'm not sure what your point is.

[–] Platomus@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

You're finding a single case and using it to dismiss the whole argument.

It's obvious.