this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
484 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39332 readers
3157 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ssladam@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I don't agree. The dnc opted to go with a strategy of, "we don't need to listen to the will of the voters, and we'll double down on doing the same gd thing we've always done, you either get on board, or bad-man wins!"

People want change. DNC refused to make even the hint of willingness to change, it's no surprise they lost so many voters.

This was entirely avoidable.

My only hope is that the DNC will finally wake the fuck up and introduce an actual progressive platform. But shit, I said the same thing when Hillary tanked. So why would it be different now?

[–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Disagree.

He is such a shithead they should have been able to run a piece of timber against him and still won. The best candidate is any other candidate.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

If I asked you to describe the candidates to me, and you started with Trump, I would say, "I don't need to hear who the other candidates are. I'm voting against this guy."

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

If an inanimate piece of timber could have won, then clearly the candidate that actually ran did something wrong.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Now imagine if the DNC would let us have a primary to pick our own special piece of timber....we might actually win an election.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

People want change.

Nah, Americans want cheap groceries and they're willing to kill the world for it because they don't understand that the President doesn't control prices of eggs.

actual progressive platform

Compare Harris' policy with Biden's and Clinton's.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

People literally were claiming she had no platform and no ideas. You could send them to her platform page and they wouldn't go.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Unpopular opinion: I would vote that all people who don't vote are first in line to be drafted with last pick on positions, aka front lines. It would help us to get people to actually care about voting.

Shoot, they are kicking 15,000 trans people out? Guess they should auto fill their ranks back up with non voters.