this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
129 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
528 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 178 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's chromium, it does that ambient color changing shit I hate, it "anticipates my needs" instead of just waiting my my instruction. This is a browser designed to make me angry.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I tried it for a bit, even daily drove it on my laptop for a while. It has a pretty slick interface, and uses containers so you could, for example, have one container that you are logged into your google account for (say, Youtube), and the rest of your containers you can not log into Google.

The downside is that 1) It's still not mature as of a month ago. They are making massive changes and adding new features constantly, and 2) It's still Chromium, so all of the downsides of that are still present.

If they switch to using Firefox or another open-source foundation, I'd be all over it.

[–] otacon239@feddit.de 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Firefox already has containers. I still have yet to see a browser that beats stock Firefox in functionality, customization and privacy

[–] original_reader@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'd venture out there and say Vivaldi in functionality and customisation.

Privacy probably not, though Vivaldi does quite well.

Sadly it's a Chromium browser.

Edit: a simple comparison.

[–] otacon239@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is the key. There are a few projects that can beat it in one way or another, but not all 3. Every project that beats FF in a functional way ends up sacrificing privacy. And those that somehow beat it in privacy are underdeveloped and run into weird compatibility issues or are missing support for key plugins.

[–] original_reader@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

It's not like Firefox doesn't collect user data at all. Vivaldi is hard to seriously fault in that area.

Unfortunately, Firefox lacks some features that make it a little clumsy at times. But for general use it is great. I keep it installed and use it almost every day because I believe in the browser engine and the need for diversity in that area. It's just not for every need. At least not for me. That's where Vivaldi and Edge have to help.

[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

According to this Vivaldi protects you from tracking about the same as Chrome and Opera, and both of those provide less tracking protection than even Edge.

[–] abhibeckert@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chrome is run by a massive corporation with a reputation for for invasions of privacy. Opera is run by a nation state with a reputation for invasions of privacy.

Vivaldi is far better than either of those.

[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm talking about first and third party websites tracking you. I don't use Chrome or Opera, but I'd rather only have to trust a browser of my choice, than having to place my trust in thousands of different websites.

The point is, if you care about tracking and privacy, you shouldn't be using Vivaldi in the first place.

[–] AndreTelevise@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

PrivacyTests makes it look like Brave is the only browser you should be using simply based on how good it is at blocking trackers by default. Brave is good, but it has it's fair share of flaws from UI and terrible syncing to built in crypto and NFT stuff.

[–] godless@latte.isnot.coffee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On mobile I'd suggest Fennec instead of stock Firefox since you can use add-ons without limitation, and don't need workarounds such as the Firefox nightly.

It's basically stock with enabled add-ons, and following the official release cycle with 2-3 days delay. Maintained by the original developers of the F-Droid store, so also a highly trustworthy source IMHO.

[–] medicake@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the heads up. I run FF on all my mobile devices so it will be nice to have access to all the addons.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

That's what I'm using now. I think Arc does a better job of organizing containers and tabs, but it's not worth the privacy/advertisement issues that come along with Chromium.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago

Sandboxing/containerizing stored session data like that is really nice. Firefox Multi-Account Containers is an extension maintained by Mozzila and was really the reason I stuck with Firefox even when it really kinda sucked there for a while.

[–] tombuben@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

The issue is that Firefox is, as far as I know, much much more difficult to simply use as just the "rendering engine" for some other customized browser.

There's the arcfox experiment thing that tries to make firefox look and feel the same as arc, but if arc isn't mature, then this thing is just simply unusable to almost everyone. It's still probably easier to do than to make a completely new browser using firefox as a base though.