this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
1238 points (98.4% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

3441 readers
1668 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhilMcGraw@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder if it was more an assumption that the rules only applied to viable pregnancies.

I mean I'm pro-choice but I'd assume anyone pushing to ban abortion is aiming to prevent viable pregnancies from being terminated while still allowing medically necessary or unviable pregnancies to be terminated.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] PhilMcGraw@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

How do they justify that? I mean I can see why people would be against aborting viable fetuses, but a fetus that will never live seems absurd.

I guess we also force dying people to wait it out, so maybe it's on trend.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 0 points 7 hours ago

Nah. The point of this is to punish women for having sex.

If they die, the harlot shouldn’t have spread her legs.

If she was raped - no she wasn’t.

The whole point is to punish women for taking control of our bodies and then becoming full citizens. Cis white men HATE women.