this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
461 points (86.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

150 readers
941 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 32 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The number of people that want to quote native Americans and talk about how native Americans were screwed over by the white man and how terrible it is all the things that have been done to them divided by the people in that group who are willing to give up their property and their lives and move back to their ancestral homes is the same as any number divided by 0.

And I'm saying this as a Lakota man.

You don't want to actually do anything about the problem with native americans.

You just want to feel Superior to other people.

But don't get off of your high horse because I'm sure the fall will kill you.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you sure about that? Because I'm pretty much for decolonisation

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You can start by getting a passport and looking into emigrating away from the United States.

Edit: well, I guess people don't like it when I'm flippant, and do like it when db0 condescends to a minority. Good show.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not American and that's not what decolonisation means anyway

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Then what the fuck are you doing talking about American colonialism when it doesn't fucking affect you?

You are very fucking brave taking a stance that other people should do something you yourself are incapable of doing.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

imagine thinking American colonialism doesn't affect anyone outside America. not to mention the person who said they advocated for decolonization didn't say for America only, so it's even more absurd. news flash: colonialism affected the entire world.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm capable of caring for things other than my immediate self interest

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't know if you're being obtuse or if you're just not getting it.

My statement was that the people who use native American sayings to make themselves feel Superior to other people are fundamentally incapable of putting their money where their mouth is.

You're saying "I'm all for other people putting their money where my mouth is" as if that somehow accomplishes anything or refutes my point.

You don't seem to understand how stupid/pointless/arrogant/self-serving that is.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

I didn't try to make myself superior. I just quoted a Native American. All the rest is your interpretation.

[–] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

arrogant/self-serving that is.

Some astronomical projection is going on here.

these people are just right wingers trolling right? This has to be a troll

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A number divided by zero equals infinity.

Except if it's zero then (so 0/0) it is either undefined or any number IIRC.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you plot out any number divided by x, as x approaches 0 the answer goes towards Infinity, yes.

When it reaches zero it ceases to be a number.

Every number divided by 0 is "undefined", and it is not undefined because we can't describe it, it is undefined because it does not exist, because you cannot divide things by 0.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Funny that you posted this in a dbzer0.com community (dbzer0 = device by zero).

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io -4 points 1 day ago

You might say that if you don't divide a number the number remains itself. But you are saying to divide a number by not dividing the number.

That mathematical process does not work. One or the other must be true for the operation to happen.

You might be saying that an infinite amount of nothing can go into any something, but that is also not true. For there to be nothing, there cannot be something.

Zero is not a number in and of itself save for when it is literally the descriptor of the lack of the existence of a quantity.

Trying to divide a number by zero is like trying to divide existence by non-existence. If existence exists, then there is no non-existence to divide it with.

Therefore you cannot mathematically compute how much non-existence there is in existence.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No. The standard field (that is, a ring where both operations are abelian groups) on the complex numbers doesn't have a multiplicative inverse of 0; rings can't have a multiplicative inverse for the additive identity. You can create an algebra with a ring as a sub-algebra with such, but it will no longer be a ring. My preferred method is to impose such an algebra on the one-point compactification of the Complex Numbers, where the single added point is denoted as "Ω".

I started this project when I was 12, and when I could show that the results were self-consistent this was what I had settled on:

let z be a complex number that is not otherwise specified by the following equations. Note: the complex numbers contain the Real numbers, and so the following equations apply to the them as well.

0Ω=Ω0=1

z+Ω=Ω+z=zΩ=Ωz=Ω=ΩΩ

Ω-Ω=0. Ω-Ω=Ω+(-Ω)=Ω+(-1Ω)=Ω+Ω=0

The algebra described above is not associative. That is to say, (AB)C does not always equal A(BC).

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I had money to own land, I'd return it to the appropriate tribe. I'm actively decolonizing my life and support the return of all federal land to tribes along with reparations. Don't put words in my mouth

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm not doing it because I believe I'm a savior. I'm doing it because it's the right thing to do. My point is that broad sweeping statements aren't helpful and efforts to progress AIM and the landback movement are far more worthwhile.