this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
530 points (99.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26801 readers
3384 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 85 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

Eh....This is a little rose coloured glasses. Anyone else remember the pre-adblock era of umpteen pop-up ads?

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I remember using internet in mid to late 90s and there were no ads, maybe OP means that period?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 38 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

A crummy history of ads on the internet:

Starts out mostly used in formal fields and universities. Very usable!

Businesses get on board and start the horrible ad infestation, leading to scammers and popup hell duw to misuse of a feature.

Ad blockers start to reign in that shit, and the better browsers kill the popup infestation at the source. Pretty darn usable at this point, except for internet explorer.

Google, an ad company, decides to make a browser so they can do all the malicious advertising and tracking on the backend.

uBlock Origin is too effective at blocking the browser based tracking and advertising so google decided to do the manifest 3 or whatever that bullshit is called to openly force ads onto users.

Based on history, I expect chrome to die a slow death due to the backlash from the manifest crap, but could be wrong since people are apparently fine with ads being forced into streaming services.

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

I think the difference is that there is not really a Netflix-without-the-ads alternative for the same price. And if you are willing to pay a bit more, well, you can just pay for the higher tier of Netflix without ads.

With browsers on the other hand, it's all free with virtually no barrier to switching. So I think people will defect away a lot more quickly when a browser starts to worsen in quality (especially since Chrome doesn't have Daddy Microsoft to force users to use it by default)

[–] Sergio 24 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Businesses get on board and start the horrible ad infestation

There were a couple years where businesses were "entering cyberspace" and still trying to figure it out. Mostly this involved static webpages, since they saw the web as a kind of yellow pages. i.e. a business' web page was their ad.

people are apparently fine with ads

It amazes me how accepting most people are of ads. I suspect Google's going to win, and their ultimate contribution to humanity will be forcing ads into everything.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why google became the dominate search engine in the first place was because every other search engine was an ad infested nightmare fuel.

There is a limit of shit that people will put up with. Google is pushing that limit hard right now. Which is why I no longer use it.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 5 hours ago

Partially. Not really. Page Rank instantly obsoleted every other search algorithm in existence. Nobody was able to get high quality results right at the top so consistently. The ad-free part was a bonus, at least for a while.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

People are accepting of ads because ads are literally everywhere. A world without ads would be very strange indeed!

Every logo that exists and every product that has its own name/brand printed on it is an ad. Every product name in a catalog or simple list is an ad.

A world without ads would be like hundreds of years ago when you could buy soap that just looked like soap with no labels and no packaging at all. When the only food you purchased was bare produce/meat (or the whole animal). But even then any assembled/manufactured product would have some sort of "maker's mark".

I mean, how long have humans been branding cattle? That's the original use of that term!

[–] Sergio 3 points 7 hours ago

That's an excellent point. Hundreds of years ago, if you wanted to recomment the product of a particularly skilled soapmaker or farmer, you'd say "Jo made that", and maybe you could point to Jo's logo on the product so your friends knew how to recognize it. So the signifier of quality (the brand) pointed to the signified of a quality product. But now the signifier has become disentangled from the signified: the advertisements and marketing campaigns promote brand loyalty even if the product becomes worse through inferior ingredients or shrinkflation. Because of this, the signifier is presented to us when we do not want to see it.

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 hours ago

A logo's very different from what I would consider an "ad". I don't mind logos existing, but anything pushed in my face is horrible and I hate it.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

It amazes me how accepting most people are of ads. I suspect Google’s going to win, and their ultimate contribution to humanity will be forcing ads into everything.

People just eat up 'personalized' things so whoever coined 'personalized ads' was an evil genius.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 20 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

pop-up ads? Ha... try pop-UNDER ads.

also can't have ads when there is no javascript to begin with. Just static content.

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

also you think content is static just because it has no js? hyperlinks! forms! the server!!!

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Hyperlinks and Forms are static, yet they allow for interactivity (communication with the server and or url handler like mailto:, tel:, fax: etc.)

iframes, frames (and framesets) were a fricking mistake. And that malicious practice with meta refresh yeah, that certainly was a thing back then. I loved when internet explorer just clicked on every navigation...

img tags, are not advertisements, or what do you mean? since you probably don't mean <img/>

also, you can edit your commit so that you don't have to spam comments.

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

different point -> different comment?
also ads technically are anything that promotes a product? i'm not using the definition of "visible malware added to a website"

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

consider this. an iframe containing a page with meta refresh, and on each load, the server adds a different hyperlinked image. and some cookies.

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

they're advertisements!

[–] simple@lemm.ee 9 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Not to mention the internet wasn't as secure as it is now. There was lots of malicious code everywhere. Oh, and if you write a typo in any website's name there was a 50/50 chance you'll be redirected to porn.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 9 hours ago

There's vastly more malicious code now than there was back then. Every company that has an online presence is constantly under attack. Constantly. There isn't an IPv4 address that exists that isn't scanned and have an attempt at hacking performed within seconds of being connected.

Not only that but today's malicious code is much better at what it does with hundreds of amazing features and methods of branching out using different attack methods. Today's malware is so good it updates itself very carefully/as secretly as possible so that some old compromised machine that no one thinks about anymore can become the next vector of attack inside your network.

All it takes is one active vulnerability

Keep all your shit up to date, people! When was the last time you checked your router to see if it had updates? Hmm‽

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

It was such a time saver...

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Imagine my surprise when Spider-Man.com lead to marvels website but Xmen.com lead to porn

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 hours ago

I think this entire response thread is too young. Back when you connected to the Internet with 14.4k and 28k modems (mid to late 90's), websites were as OP described. Simply put, there was no bandwidth for too much extra crap.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 3 points 10 hours ago

Came here to say this. They make a joke about how many adds are on the Internet in an episode of Futurama that aired in 2000.