this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
120 points (98.4% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2323 readers
201 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

President-elect Donald Trump’s support for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an outspoken opponent of water fluoridation, is pushing baseless anti-fluoride views into mainstream debate.

Despite scientific consensus that fluoridation is safe and prevents tooth decay, especially in underserved communities, Kennedy plans to advise water districts against it, citing unfounded health concerns.

While fluoridation decisions are regulated by state and local governments, Trump’s administration could influence conservative states to drop fluoridation, potentially undermining a key public health tool and increasing dental health disparities, particularly for disadvantaged children.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bacano@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Everytime this topic is mentioned people say the same things about how the critics of fluorinated municipal water don't know how much it's helped cavities and stuff. Someone once pointed out that it's important to understand that their concern is on its effects on brain chemistry for which there's evidence that it has toxic effects.

Dental health is irrelevant so save your breath or at least know that it's seen as a straw man argument. Personally, I looked it up and can see the potential for negative effects (imbalance in seratonin levels as per a .gov website). I still drink the fluoride water but do so with jaded resignation that I may be participating in the lead pipe experiment of my generation.

[–] BugKilla@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Everytime this topic comes up somebody who claims "I did my own research!" always bleats out anecdotes without basis, scientific proof or citing credible sources.

Deployed at the optimal concentration level, fluoride in water poses no impact to human mental or phyisological development. Dental health is relevant when your teeth are fucked and there is clear evidence that poor dental hygiene results in poor health outcomes more broadly. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8361186/

Here is an Australian systemic review goes back when fluoridation was first introduced in the 1950s (Tasmania) and federally in the 1970s. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512301719X It covers the scientific data available, health studies conducted and makes mention of the politicisation of the subject.