this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
105 points (99.1% liked)

Wikipedia

1525 readers
327 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Over ten thousand years, erosion or earthquakes can expose the entrance, contaminating the site. People could dig a well or prospect for minerals. The suggestion of underground activity could suggest to them that it is a good place to mine, or even that there's a tomb or other interesting artifacts

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

If enough erosion or earthquakes occured to expose the entrance, I don't think a sign would fare too well.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, that is is putting way more importance on coincidences than is actually warranted. But lets not loose sight of the general idea.

We need to deal with this waste, on that we are all agreed, we have limited resources to do so.

This means that we need to prioritize the actual waste containment rather than building some weird scarecrow to scare people away who may not even use the same concepts let alone language as we do.

It is ridiculous.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

For me, it shows a compassion for the people of the future, which is inspiring in a way. Similar to the Voyager golden records, which are unlikely to ever be found by anyone, it is partially an exercise in understanding ourselves.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

I'd rather they showed compassion by not wasting resources and built the proper waste disposal sites so that we can increase nuclear power use and shutdown coal/oil/gas.

Global warming is a way bigger threat than at worst a few localized hazards.

Any money diverted from waste disposal to this idea is wasted.