this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
181 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

1366 readers
1211 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

At what point is that acceptable? Attacks like this were well known when this was new so shouldn't they fix it? 12 year old cars have been recalled before, but there are a lot of cars without the latest safety fixes. We need aeserious debate over when it is accebtable to call something that works scrap because it isn't supported. there are costs to the environment and society around this so even though I don't own one of these devices I'm affected but it.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Last sold 20+ years ago sounds reasonable.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Cars are not consumer grade NAS. If you want your consumer NAS to have the same regulated support requirements, expect to see prices go up by about 5x or more. Auto tech doesn't age out like computer tech. I wouldn't want a 20 year old device - the power consumption alone would be horrific, let alone the performance and lack of capability.

These are already 4 years past EOL. Know how long we spec servers for our clients? 5 years, max (we push them to replace at 4 years).

After 5 years the risks go up, and dealing with an outage will cost more in support costs than simply having planned and deployed a new system already.

These devices are double our server lifetime already - last made in 2013.

Again, I do dumb shit like this for my own systems at home, because I deal with the risk myself (redundancy). I'd never let a client do this. If someone had one of these at any point, I would've been replacing it - even if it was brand new.

My complaint against Dlink is these things were junk from the start. But expecting anything from them years after EOL is unreasonable.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

It would be REALLY nice if IT appliances had replaceable admin boards, especially for something as simple as a nas that probably hasn't upgraded the PCI buss in a decade :)