this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
11 points (92.3% liked)
Pleasant Politics
235 readers
316 users here now
Politics without the jerks.
This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read !santabot@slrpnk.net for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.
Rules
Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.
All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.
No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Their main account was banned on their home instance lemmy.world, hence it is debatable that this is intentional ban evasion.
I appreciate your transparency. It sounds like this was an honest mistake and not intentional ban evasion. It is true that we hold solarpunks to higher standards of discourse than you may be used to on other platforms. The members may be right to be concerned. I understand many of the people you've sparred with in the past have not engaged in good internet etiquette either. But you could really help us out as admins by making a commitment to good-faith debate, at least while using this account.
I don't consider your participation in this thread ban evasion. This is not the kind of discussion that should be moved to direct messages. If @auk wants to ban you, we can move this discussion to !meta.
I didn't even think about this. No, I don't consider UniversalMonk's participation in this post to be ban evasion. I'm fine giving him a chance to defend himself, if he wants to. It sounds like he's done now with what he had to say.
The decision to give him an account, while he's still arguing vociferously that there was nothing wrong with the conduct that got him site-banned before, is confusing.