this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
863 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19118 readers
3091 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On election night, as the results looked to be in Trump’s favor, the baseless conspiracy theories about fraud began tapering off.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ah, so now it's time for baseless accusations from our side, yes?

As long as there is no proof this is as much a conspiration theory as the the bullshit the right was spewing about in 2020.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah yes, it's exactly the same with no differences, surely Trump isn't known to be a cheat and a liar from every single other interaction he's ever had with a human being. Surely he hasn't stated publicly his intentions to cheat the election. No, he's a perfect human being and we're all just shouting about voter fraud because we're stupid.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, it's exactly the same with no differences,

Not what I said.

surely Trump isn't known to be a cheat and a liar

I think it need more than one person to cheat on this scale, no?

Surely he hasn't stated publicly his intentions to cheat the election.

He hasn't. He said they need no more votes. You are taking thins one thing he said and pretending it's "intention to cheat the election.". Which is simply not true. It could also mean that he is sure he will win, because he thinks he has got all the states he needs on his side. I'm sure there are more interpretations. But that's all it is.

No, he's a perfect human being

Never said that.

we're all just shouting about voter fraud because we're stupid.

Never said that. Your angry, hurt, what ever. Emotional. And I understand that. I'm absolutely devasted by this shit. And I see how one might jump to conspiracy thinking in such a situation. I just don't think it helps, so I'll call it what it is. Not to attack you, as a person, or to call you names. Just because I don't think it's helpful.

I think we (as in "the left") should try to base our opinions on facts and not repeat the shit the right is doing all the time, throwing baseless accusations around.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's fair, and I'm sorry to have been an asshole about it. I deserve that. However, conspiracy thinking or no, I think it's extremely valid to be suspicious of these results. There are quite a lot of factors at play here that can cast what I consider to be reasonable doubt over this whole situation.

Sure, don't jump right to conspiracy theories off the bat, fair enough. But also don't be blind to what is in front of us. Things don't add up here in a way that makes sense to me. In particular, I question the fact that nearly 1 in 2 Latino voters voted to deport themselves and their families, and I find it difficult to believe that 15+ million other voters who showed up to vote for Joe Biden, didn't show up to vote for Harris. It was all the same threat, magnified, with a much more palatable upside than the first time and a much more clear view of the alternative. These people should have been, and by all accounts were, even more motivated than in 2020. This is the most politicized election we've had in over a century, nobody didn't hear about this.

The whole thing just stinks. It stinks all to hell and I think I'm justified in believing the conservatives pulled off a successful steal this time just like they've been promising to, not least of which is because by the time I woke up after election night everyone had already decided none of the Dems showed up and Trump had won, when according to gov websites the final vote tally and certification isn't even until mid December. I've never seen election results get called so early that I can remember. I saw three different news stories about conservatives setting ballot boxes on fire. Our gerrymandering maps are so bad they can be confused for TV static from a distance. Millions of people had their voting registration purged by state level conservatives weeks or days before the election.

I think a little bit of suspicion surrounding the results is beyond justified.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's fair, and I'm sorry to have been an asshole about it.

No worries. We all have to cope with this some way or another and sometimes that mean beeing a bit of an asshole. I don't take it personal, I understand where you are coming from.

I question the fact that nearly 1 in 2 Latino voters voted to deport themselves

Latin are a conservative bunch by nature. Many of the progressiv view the left hold, regarding for example masculinity and feminism, stand in contrast to their culture. (This is a very broad statement that does not aplly to all Lations!) And many think that it's not going to be them that will be deported, it will he those Mexican drug smugglers. Which is a delusional view to hold, in my opinion. Same fore for queer folk voting red. But it is want it is and the data we have from polling and voting do add up in regards to Lations.

I find it difficult to believe that 15+ million other voters who showed up to vote for Joe Biden, didn't show up to vote for Harris.

Yes, that's hard to swallow, I agree. Maybe it's because the last vote happened with Corona in the backdrop? Maybe Trumps many Errors where much more fresh on the mind of so many. Maybe inflation kept people from trusting the Democrats. Maybe some just won't vote for a female. Or a black person. Or, god forbid, both. Lots of possible reasons. I do think we should try to understand them and filter them on in the future.

This is the most politicized election we've had in over a century, nobody didn't hear about this.

Yes, but that means you also listen to 2 party's accusing one another of beeing the devil / literaly Hitler for one year plus. I see how people who are not that interested in politics can get numb to this.

because by the time I woke up after election night everyone had already decided none of the Dems showed up and Trump had won, when according to gov websites the final vote tally and certification isn't even until mid December.

This realy sound exactly what republicans said in 2020.

I've never seen election results get called so early that I can remember.

That's because they were realy very obvious this time. It didn't come down to just a couple of votes in swingstates like in 2020.

According to this 2016, 2012 and 2008 where called on simular schedules or earlier. 2020 was an outline because of the amount of mail in votes.

I saw three different news stories about conservatives setting ballot boxes on fire. Our gerrymandering maps are so bad they can be confused for TV static from a distance. Millions of people had their voting registration purged by state level conservatives weeks or days before the election.

All of there are fair points, and they should be handled in two ways: Take evidence to the courts where illegal things happend. And try to change the system where fraud has been made legal.

Regarding both points i think it is a very real possibility that the window to deal with them is past and the Trump administration will solidify and widen them. This might have been our last fair election.

My only hope is that it goes like last time and they are at each other's throuts for 4 years or just to incompetent to do to much that has lasting damaged. But I'm not betting on that. I think this time they will come prepared. And it will be the end of America as it is now.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

You've been very reasonable about this in the face of my ranting and I appreciate it. I specifically don't want to become "blue MAGA" and level heads like yours are what's going to prevent a lot of us from going there. I'm still mad, and I still think this all needs attention and isn't getting it, though. I don't know what to do about that other than crow about it on the internet or show up to the white house. I don't think either of those are good ideas.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One person is not a conspiracy theory. "I believe..." is what I wrote. Trump is a convicted criminal, proven liar and a deadbeat who stiffs people. It's quite logical to look negatively on an individual who admires dictators and the worst genocidal person in history (so far).

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One person is not a conspiracy theory

Sure, but you are not the only person here, who is taking that narrative.

Sure Trump is a fucking Bastard. But we hit quite hard on the right for speeding their conspiracy "stolen election" shit in 2020. I just don't think it's sensible to turn that around. With clear cut evidence: sure thing. But just making the accusation... Na, not so much.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And yet we are comparing one persons speculation against the man who has lied on record over 30+ thousand times while he was pretending to be president. We are all entitled to our opinions. I am not leading the charge to be like maga but blue. If I was, you would be correct in screaming at me because you should tell people they are in a cult. I was bring up a possibility that the nasty orange nazi probably broke the law, again. Because, that's his actual job.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I honestly don't see how I am or was screaming at you and u apologise if it came across as such. You are stating your opinion, which you indeed are entitled too. I am stating why I disagree. I am not attacking you as a person, or trying to belittle you for it. I simply don't think it beneficial (for the left) to hold the view you have stated without evidence.

Trump is a con man and a liar, absolutely. But for pulling of something on this scale it needs way, way more than one person. And all of them would have to hold tight, no leaks what so ever. That just doesn't sound realistic to me. I do hold the view hat we should base our opinions in fact, not speculation. I don't mean this as an attack. Ist just my view.

I am also not accusing you or anyone of beeing in cult.

I said it before to another person here, I'll say it again: I understand how you, how we all are angry, hurt, devasted even after this election. I share those emotions very much.

I still don't think we should copy the behaviour of the other side. I know you feel justified in your option. So do they. That doesn't make it more or less true though. Cult like would leave no room for discussion what so ever tough. I think we have that room, and are engaging in it right now. I think indeed the very fact that we are able to exchange opinions on this shows how this is very much not a cult.