this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024

119 points (92.8% liked)

196

16563 readers

2258 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone

greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone

moss@lemmy.world

queue@beehaw.org

funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone

PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone

threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone

greembow@lemmy.world

remotelove@lemmy.ca

Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de

qaz@lemmy.world

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee

qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world

qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com

qaz@sh.itjust.works

qaz@lemmy.sdf.org

119

Furukawa Rule (i.imgur.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by alexiascylding@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

backwards compatibility is pog

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] alexiascylding@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

well i think the switch was only not backwards compatible with the wii u because like the switch from discs to cartridges and from power pc to arm like it just wasnt feasible i reckon. switch 2 from the leaks seems to be just a higher powered and slightly bigger nintendo switch so backwards compatibility is a no brainer. but its good to have the confirmation

[–] fern@lemmy.autism.place -1 points 2 weeks ago

These are all shortcomings because backwards compatiblity was not a consideration. Compare the Wii, which essentially had a whole GameCube in it for backwards compatiblity.