Programming

17366 readers

169 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

Do they know one second is slow? (registerspill.thorstenball.com)

submitted 1 year ago by invicticide@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Computers can create and destroy entire worlds in one second. One second is multiple billions – billions! – of executed instructions. One second is an eternity for a computer.

Yet I sometimes wonder whether one second is the smallest unit of time most programmers think in. Do they know that you can run entire test suites in 1s and not just a single test? Do they know that one second is slow?

Seeing how slow modern software can be, on modern hardware, just makes me sad sometimes. I really feel this person's pain, including the slow creeping insanity of "how is nobody else noticing/bothered by this". 😓

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tvkan@feddit.de 65 points 1 year ago (5 children)

complains about losing one second

literally has an "sign up for my newsletter!"-overlay that appears in front of the article, while you're reading the article

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And talks about a time before the internet while he looks what? 30-40 in that image?

Yes, things are bloated and slow, it's annoying. But the article didn't add much or go into the reasons why.

[–] Walnut356@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

People in different socioeconomic situations/locations experience new technology at different points in time. Just because the internet existed doesnt mean they (or anyone in their immediate vicinity) had internet, state of the art computers, etc.

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a Substack thing, not added by the author

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sure but if they chose a better publishing platform that time wasting overlay wouldn't be there.

Maybe if the author chose better tools, they wouldn't have to wait around so much? I don't have to wait 1 second for a unit test to run for example - and I don't have particularly fast hardware..

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they didn't have time to see how the platform performed for the reader?

[–] snowe@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

They only waited half a second before signing up

[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 10 points 1 year ago

The author chose to host on a platform that does that. So it is their fault

[–] gamma@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

I was going to say "At least I can click 'Continue reading' and it actually goes away immediately" but actually, no. This is still enshittification, I've just gotten used to shittier versions of it.

[–] zlatko@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, there was a bit of discussion about that on Lobsters :)