this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
345 points (98.3% liked)

Gaming

3161 readers
12 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

But didn't the WiiU requitlre a base console still and just streamed that image to the handheld?

Versus the switch that is that base console and handheld.

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The Wii u was better (when the game developer used it correctly), it was a separate screen that showed different content. It was more like a DS.

Some of the games in Nintendo land were excellent local multiplayer games that will never get replicated again. They made great use of the second screen concepts.

[–] SolarMonkey 3 points 2 weeks ago

I loved playing hyrule warriors (the first one) on it, because you could play local co-op but not split screen, without needing another unit. It was an absolutely superior experience to split screen.

I wish there was something similar with a higher quality screen, but I think that ship has probably sailed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)