this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
1264 points (98.1% liked)

Comic Strips

12976 readers
3361 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 116 points 1 month ago (9 children)

one day we will just stick with daylight time. its kind of a slap in the face to lose your only hour of sunlight after work!

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now if only all people, managers, businesses, unions, realized they could set what time they worked to whatever the hell they wanted within reason, moved to somewhere closer to the equator, got up earlier to use the morning instead of the night, did stuff at night...

Either way, we need to do away with the switching lol.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Eh......I think we need to do away with the concept of money, and work, and managers owning the majority of our time.

You think a cat gives a fuck what time Starbucks closes??? Hell no! They just sleep on your bed, or on the floor, or on a table, or on the stairs, or anywhere they want, anytime they want. And they make SURE you are always looking at their butthole.

You think you can just go into starbucks, and present your butthole, to all who look at you, while also sleeping on their counter? I mean, you're TOTALLY in the way, and making everyones lives more inconvienent......but fuck 'em, ya know?

You can't do ANY of that! Because for some reason, we've all decided that little green paper controls our lives.

Or in the case of Canada, multicolored monopoly money.

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You think you can just go into starbucks, and present your butthole, to all who look at you, while also sleeping on their counter?

I mean, anybody can do pretty much anything they want at least once.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

One day we will just stick with standard time.

(Or we’ll try permanent DST and experience all of the negative effects and then either go back to cycling or realize we should’ve done permanent standard.)

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Or we'll realize that the specific numbers are arbitrary and use UTC everywhere.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It's almost 22 UTC

Which is 5pm EST

8am EST is when most work starts

That's 15 hours from now

So work would start at 13 UTC

Yes, these are arbitrary numbers. Doesn't matter if we go to work at 8am EST or 13 UTC.

However, this has nothing to do with daylight savings time or with what daylight savings time is trying to accomplish.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

China does a variant of this where the whole country is on Beijing time. 99% Invisible did an episode that covered it here: https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/matters-of-time/

Basically the local Uyghur population in Xinjiang code switch and maintain an unofficial local time which aligns more closely with the movement of the sun.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You are right, but do you really want to deal with the confusion of having to wake up at some random number like 4pm UTC? And then if you finally get used to that you travel abroad and now you have to wake up at 1am? Timezones are a mess but if done correctly, they make sense because the numbers won't be arbitrary.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't see how dealing with that is any worse than dealing with time zones.

Downside of UTC everywhere: you might have to set your alarm for a different time when you travel.

Upsides: Never need to account for timezones in communication. Never need to change a clock, ever.

They make sense because the numbers won't be arbitrary.

But they are. There's no changing that. They're arbitrary now. They'd be arbitrary if we had UTC everywhere. We're not out here using sundials to set our clocks, 12:00 is not solar noon more often than it is.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

12:00 is not solar noon more often than it is.

if timezones were done correctly it would be and the numbers wouldn't be that arbitrary

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It definitely would not be, regardless of whatever "done correctly" means. Solar noon at exactly 12:00 is only going to happen on a single line of longitude. If you have a timezone centered on that line and exactly 15° (one hour) wide then solar noon will be up to 30 minutes away from 12:00 depending on your east/west position in that timezone.

It was exactly this realization that the numbers were arbitrary and 12:00 didn't need to be solar noon that led to the creation of timezones in the first place, so that it's not 4:14 in Norwich while it's 3:52 in Birmingham and just travelling from city to city doesn't mean you're changing your watch constantly and it becomes actually possible to write a sensible rail schedule.

Timezones are already a step toward an arbitrary standard time for the purposes of making communication easier and not needing to change your watch just because you moved around. UTC everywhere would just be another larger step in that already established direction.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I'm with you. Another perk is a sense of where you are on the planet. If I get up with the sunrise at 22:00 somewhere, then travel somewhere the sun rises around 18:00, it's obvious the sun is hitting this part of the planet sooner.

If UTC were widely adopted, it'd be interesting to see what employers near time zones would do. EG start work at 19:00 or 20:00? 19:30? Flex-time with mandatory core hours from 22:00 to 02:00? Maybe I'm over optimistic, but it seems like it would encourage more flexible work hours.

The negative effects are either due to the act of changing the clocks forward implemented in such a way as to deprive everyone everywhere an hour of sleep, or something something natural light in the morning. Which is not a benefit of "standard" or "daylight savings" time, it's a complete and utter failure of "work starts at 6AM and ends at 10PM."

The solution: Lynch all the rich people. If there's no one to be forced to build wealth for, we won't have to work such long hours and we can get up and have free time in daylight.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This article is stupid. In the winter it's dark when I get up for work and it's dark when I done witn work.

If we adopt permanent DST, the simple answer is just shift your daily schedule accordingly.

[–] SasquatchCosmonaut@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Lol it even implies that living on the Western edge of a time zone increases your likelihood of breast cancer. Get the fuck out of here

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where I live, even our winter time isn't close to be aligned with sun time (GMT+1 though we're basically on the Greenwich meridian). Summer time is off by two hours.

Problem is, our school/work/activity schedules have been made to adapt to that, so having days centered around actual sun midday would sound like crazy talk to people. It's just because of how we already compensated for it.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

So many people don't understand that the same outcome of an 'extra hour' after work could be had by shorter work hours or not having the majority of the typical office workday after noon.

9-5 was a 3|5 split. 8-5 is a 4|5 split. Treating 5 pm as the only rime to end the office workday is the fucking problem, not the sun. Changing clocks twice a year is a problem.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Permanent daylight time gives us all of the downsides and exactly one benefit. I'm sorry you live that far North/South but that's just how the seasons and tilt of the earth work. We shouldn't be doing split time at all and we shouldn't endeavor to be an hour off the rest of the world just so commuters can drive home with the sun in their eyes.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (12 children)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I say this every year: FUUUUUUUUCK THAT.

With permanent DST the latest sunrise in Detroit would be 0900. That's fucking absurd. All across the US kids would be waiting for the school bus in the dark, walking to those bus stops in the dark. My personal beef with it is that I, and many of the people that make the world go 'round, start at 0600. We need to see ASAP for safety, if nothing else.

The US tried it in the early '70s, didn't even finish the two year trial period:
https://www.npr.org/2022/03/19/1087280464/the-u-s-tried-permanent-daylight-saving-time-in-the-1970s-then-quickly-rejected-

Fuck DST. If people really want it to stay light until 2100 in the summer then so be it but don't make a lot of the working class labor half their day in the dark in the depths of winter.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Kids all across the US are waiting at the bus in the dark anyway.

Not everyone gets to get on a bus after sunrise.

The better answer is to just quit switching altogether, and socially adjust everything to x hours pre mid-day sun.

With everything being connected these days it's trivial (hell, industrial clocks have been tied to electrical frequency since 1900, so it's always been trivial to compensate them).

If "6am" slowly moved every day due to when mid-day sun/sunrise occurs, no one would even notice.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Maybe instead of focusing on 6 am we just accept that noon makes sense as when the sun is highest in the sky (or close as we can get with timezones) and that the time the sun comes up will change throughout the year.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I say keep the time at either at ST or DST and let the different institutions/businesses decide their hours of operation. I'll bet you after a year or two, 99% will settle on something and keep it throughout the year.

[–] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Found the ancient Mesopotamian...

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

In the north? Here in the middle of the country it's reasonable.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

There's a lot of commerce that would actually be disrupted by doing that. Software developers would certainly riot.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

My personal complaint is that I would have an extra hour of work in the dark, and DST does that to me anyway. My schedule is earlier than office workers and I like it.

Even my days off are early and it's great. I know the country is going to go permanent DST eventually and I'll adapt, but it's still stupid IMO.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

You can't make the days longer and I still think the sun in the afternoon/evening is more useful.

It's true moving the clocks around doesn't do anything. But I know my kids wanted more hours of daylight after school not before school.

Though I also think school ought to start closer to 9:00.

[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you like the time change, or do you want to stick to standard time?

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My preference is to stick to standard. If people insist on DST I acquiesce.

I know I could just go live in Arizona, but then I'd have to live in Arizona.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Flagstaff is nice. Williams and Winslow are nice if you're fully remote. Anything South of Camp Verde or Prescott is just ridiculous though.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If people insist on DDT I aquiesce.

No. Fuck them. If I'm get a Spring Forward I'm owed a goddamned Fall Back. I spend half a year with an hour's deficit so people going home to watch Netflix after work can pretend they give a damn about an extra hour of sunlight.

Give me Standard Time or pay to move my ass to the West a couple hundred miles to fix it.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Detroit is an interesting one.

If Detroit kept DST permanent, the sun would basically set after 6pm every day.

However. Like you said, no one wants to wait until the 9am for the sun to rise.

Abolishing DST could be beneficial for Detroit. Not as many days where the sun sets after 6. But more days where it rises before 7.

The current system is bad for Detroit. It should either abolish it or keep it permanent.

Detroit night owls would want to keep it, early birds would want to abolish it.

Detroit is like El Paso TX. Where the current system is clearly bad.

Maine is the opposite. The current system is "best" and the birds and owls fight.

I live in Charlotte NC. I've always been for DST. Permanent DST means basically 365 days where the sun sets after 6pm. While getting basically the same number of days where the sun rises before 7am. I'm not an early riser, so as long as it's up by 8/9am most of the time it's fine with me.

Arizona has it right. What I want in Charlotte shouldn't matter to what you want in Detroit.

You hate DST, I like it. You should be able to get rid of it, I should be able to keep it.

Different places are affected by it much more or less. People are owls or birds. You can't make everybody happy with one option.

Maine is so far away from everything else it could be in it's own time zone. That's why it is a strange case.

Never really thought about Detroit being almost directly north of Charlotte.

Red lines are current time zones. Red circle is El Paso. Blue lines are if you equally cut US into 4 time zones.

Detroit is to the right of the red line. It has 3 boxes to reach the beginning of the time zone which is just to the right of Maine. (Sorry didn't draw it)

El Paso being in the circle makes it 3 boxes to reach the beginning of time zone just like Detroit and why it is in the similar situation with DST.

The right two time zones are large time zones. The left two are only 2 boxes wide.

Maine should be in a separate time zone than Detroit

Detroit should probably move to CST. Then, argue about daylight savings time in the summer to be EST (Not EDT)

Sounds like something you'd like, maybe?

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's clearly a complex issue. I didn't realize that Eastern and Central were so much bigger than Mountain and Pacific, honestly. Central is crazy across the southern US.

Normally I don't mind the change so much but it's kicking my ass this fall for some reason. I don't actually live in Detroit, I just know it's one of the more extreme examples like El Paso (but they just want to stick with the rest of TX anyway). I live in CO and wake up early; Looking at Fig1 it's obvious that I would like it abolished but most here would like it permanent. lol, poor Utah.

I dunno, the majority of people seem to want permanent, I know CO has a law saying as soon as Congress allows it we're going to stay on DST. So it's coming, but I don't have to like it.

Fuck DST.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I just realized that El Paso is actually in MST. They must have hated it so bad not to stick with the rest of Texas. But whoever lives in the farthest point west but still in CST is being screwed. Same with EST.

Funny the section of Texas that is in MST is three tiny blocks, basically the same width as all of Michigan. Texas is big lol.

Michigan should probably move to CST

When I think of Colorado I think of it being way north. You could live in Colorado and be as north as someone living in Raleigh NC almost. That's wild.

Yeah Colorado seems to appear to be all up to preference on the choices. It's at the start of a time zone. People on the east lean towards permanent MDT, People on the west lean towards permanent MST.

Im guessing that you live towards the west side. Yet if most people around you seem to want it, then maybe you live on east side lol

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So what you are saying is that kids can walk to school in the dark at 7am anyway?

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Not in Colorado. Detroit has to deal with their own shit, I guess.

[–] dafo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I honestly think the 24 hour daylight weeks would be worse.

[–] dafo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

You get used to it. Blinds are you friend, but driving is the worst. The sun is always in your eyes.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Depends where you live. Up north it only makes a difference for a few weeks. Then it's still dark after work for most of the winter.

load more comments (2 replies)