Arch Linux

7759 readers

2 users here now

The beloved lightweight distro

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

Which is better: Aura or Paru? (programming.dev)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by AsudoxDev@programming.dev to c/archlinux@lemmy.ml

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been using paru. Just wanted to know if aura is, in your opinion, better than paru and why.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Neither. Use yay, because it sounds happy.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hehe

I'm using yay, because it was "the new thing", when I switched to Arch (and Arch-based systems)

But after that I've stopped comparing

Is there anything new, that is actually worth switching from yay?

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Paru was at one point a rewrite of yay in Rust, and has since continued development as a pseudo parallel fork. It's good. Dunno if it's worth switching, you'd have to see if there's any specific features you might happen to want, but they're both fine

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Thanks! :⁠-⁠)

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe there's builtin customizepkg or custom repo support in some helper?

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I love typing 'yay kitty' on a new install

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

And now I must follow suit

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

+1 for happy package manager