Technology

59414 readers

2846 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

229

Waymo Reaches 150k Autonomous Rides Per Week Milestone While Tesla FSD Lags Behind (futurism.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by VantaBrandon@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"While Waymo is now providing over 150,000 autonomous rides every week, Tesla still has a long way to go until its controversial "Full Self-Driving" software is ready for the EV maker's competing robotaxi service.

Just this week, a Tesla driver plowed through a deer without even a hint of slowing down with the $8,000 add-on feature turned on, and another smashed into someone else's car when its owner employed its Summon feature."....

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And then the car mistook the side of a white semi for the sky and plowed full speed into the semi, decapitating the driver. These systems see, but don't really understand what they see.

[+] Fizz@lemmy.nz -9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Self driving doesn't need to be perfect it only needs to be better than humans.

Examples like this are kind of pointless because humans are incredibly bad drivers statistically.

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It needs to be quite a bit better than humans to actually take off. The difference between a person driving and anything else is who is in control, and therefore to blame. Just being statistically better than the average person isn’t good enough, imho.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

An order of magnitude better would give trust. Slightly better doesn´t convince people.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I still think the technology would be getting pushed forward even if it was only slightly better than humans. However it is far safer than humans which is why its growing rapidly in application.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

However humans may also be getting better via self driving tools such as radar cruise control. So you’d need to compare to a human with access to these tools.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Thats a good point. I cant wait for that stuff to become more widely available so we can see how that impacts things.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Human eyes are far better than cameras at real time adaptation to varied lighting conditions though.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago

And we can predict what will happen pretty well and adapt to the situation dynamically. Our only weakness is that we do stupid shit like drunk driving, speeding and not paying attention.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

I'm pretty sure we're a human would not have made that mistake though so it's already not better than humans.