this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
884 points (87.1% liked)

Political Memes

5489 readers
2997 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] null 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Of course I understand what a hypothetical is, and I answered what I would do in the situation you presented me with.

No, you created your own hypothetical and answered based on that. My hypothetical has only 2 possible answers, and you refuse to answer it because you know it dismantles your stance.

The hypothetical you presented about asking a vegan if they'd eat pork or beef is perfectly valid by the way. If they answered "neither" they would also not be answering the question. But that wouldn't make veganism indefensible, don't put words in my mouth.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Both options are fundamentally unacceptable to me. There is no conceivable situation where I would vote for either.

If you're somehow compelling me to act against my will, then, I don't know, I might pick one randomly, or I might pick the one you don't like out of spite, or I might pick the one you do like out of the hope you'll be merciful to me in the future, since in this universe you can apparently control my body against my will.

[–] null 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

There is no conceivable situation where I would vote for either.

Since you refuse to engage, let's rephrase:

Which would be the better outcome, Trump winning, or Kamala winning?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Kamala winning, at least in the short term, but it does set a bad precedent if it means the democrats learn they can support genocide and get away with it.

[–] null 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

And in the long term?

(Thank you for finally answering)

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not a psychic, so it's difficult to say, but I will answer Kamala since you are so insistent on unambiguous answers.

[–] null 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So in the short and long term, based on our best assessments, we agree the better outcome of this election is for Kamala to win over Trump*.

Do you also agree that there is an (effectively) 0% chance of a third-party candidate winning this election? That come election night, the winner will either be Kamala or Trump?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] null 3 points 3 weeks ago (44 children)

In that case, do you think people in swing states should vote for Kamala?

load more comments (44 replies)