this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
1321 points (98.7% liked)

Progressive Politics

1112 readers
748 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PixelatedCleric@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

We have tried to vote and indicate whatever desire we have for statehood or independence. Y'all (as in US Government, not citizens) just use the results to wipe your asses.

Slight edit: I'm Puerto Rican

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

PR has held referendums on this multiple times. During the five major referendums (not including the sixth one where voter turnout was like less than 20%) three of them -- the majority of the five major referendums -- resulted in not wanting statehood. Another had incredibly high levels of abstention, and the most recent one resulted in wanting statehood by only a 2% majority.

For such a long-term action with wide-ranging effects, I think it's reasonable to expect Puerto Rico to clearly make the preference known by an unquestionable 2/3rd majority since it effects everyone on the island. Shoving through something so dramatic based on a slight majority is disrespectful to the half of the island that doesn't want to become a state. Whether that would pass through congress is unknown, but certainly not in the current moment. But an irrefutable desire for statehood coming from PR itself seems a necessary first step before anything else is done, and that has not yet occurred.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

There's also the fact that a lot of people in power in Puerto Rico (and in mainland U.S.) are making a lot of money off of the grifty laws under which the territory is governed. So when these referendums come up the propaganda machine starts to do its work on the populace.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago

this is a critical point. any chance of a meaningful positive change for Puerto Rico runs the risk of being overrun with corruption at very high levels, especially corruption coming from the U.S. i would guess the island has a better chance if they become a U.S. state, because federal law on corruption in the states is strict, or at least more strict

[–] PixelatedCleric@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I understand your point, but at the end of the day those that vote are the ones that "count". I personally am one of the many that didn't vote in those referendums due to feeling insulted by them.

The general consensus of this is that why would you vote in this when it won't change anything? Congress didn't approve it, so nothing will come out of it. There are some other reasons, of course, but this one of the most common ones.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You think the people that vote are the ones that count, but you were insulted by a domestically initiated internal referendum asking you to vote on the future political status of your community, so you didn't vote..? Without a clear mandate from Puerto Rico itself, you seem to be saying you'd prefer congress to decide the status of Puerto Rico for Puerto Ricans.

If so, you got exactly what you asked for, and I see little room for complaining about it.

[–] PixelatedCleric@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's a complicated situation, many people were upset due to the status consultation process being used as fear mongering for some national concerns and as leverage to have people vote a certain way to "guarantee the right choice" by multiple political parties.

This reason is why so many people abstained from voting in these last two.

I personally don't believe Congress will ever grant statehood to Puerto Rico, but my opinion is hardly relevant to this particular situation.

Tldr of why I didn't vote is very simple. If Congress won't acknowledge the multiple results of past referendums and the local parties use the referendums for fear mongering...not a worthwhile effort.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

But that's my point. I think you have the order of operations wrong. The multiple results of past referendums have been, in general, against statehood. The most recent showed a bare majority. Without an unquestionable majority of Puerto Ricans making clear what they want for Puerto Rico, asking congress to take unilateral action on the political status of the island -- whether it's statehood, commonwealth, or independent nation -- is just a rehearsal of the same domestic-dependent imperialism that made Puerto Rico a commonwealth in the first place. The fact that congress not doing anything means PR stays a commonwealth is a result of that being the current status quo. If the people of PR want a change in the political status of PR, they need to initiate that and make it clear.

You can't say that the referendums don't count, that internal politics influences the results, and that it's just fear-mongering because PR wouldn't be able to be economically stable as an independent nation -- all internal problems that don't need congress's involvement to be remedied -- and then simultaneously criticize congress for not doing anything. That's a wildly colonized mindset. Not doing anything is precisely what congress should be doing, if they have any respect for the self-governance and desires of the Puerto Rico itself.