If the war ended this moment, I could absolutely see Russia's military getting stronger over the next few years compared to today. However, the war won't end for awhile yet. In the mean time their military will continue to be beaten down by Ukraine and sanctions will continue to hamper their industrial base. Not to mention the ever-mounting demographic issues Russia has take an increasing toll on their military and economy as time passes.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yes if the war ended tomorrow, I suppose you are right they could rebuild some of what they've lost, and become stronger than they became at their weakest.
But it would be very dangerous politically to allocate a lot of ressources to the military after the war, when the country is in dire need of restoration to where they were before the war. Even if they haven't been bombed much, Russia has lost a lot economically, investments in infrastructure and production has been near zero for almost 2 years already, even the already existing capacity hasn't been maintained.

Russians a getting poorer fast, and just ending the war will not automatically turn things around, the economy is not healthy, and Russia needs to allocate ressources for restoring the economy, which will mean that ordinary household economies will be strained for years.

The "magic" economic growth we saw after WW2 will not happen for Russia, because the conditions that existed back then to create it, are not present today. For instance women entering the workplace in greater numbers. Where Russia will remain short on manpower.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But it would be very dangerous politically to allocate a lot of ressources to the military after the war, when the country is in dire need of restoration to where they were before the war.

I'd argue the reverse, Putin isn't ruling democratically, he doesn't need votes or approval. He DOES need a very strong military to stay in power, which is why Russia has the "national guard", Rosgvardiya, under the sole authority of the president.

Of course, a palace guard military has very different material demands, and their main use is against civilians and other military, so the level of equipment can be decreased, but for a dictator to have a country full of disgruntled veterans is a very dangerous thing.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Keeping your own population in check is way cheaper than waging war. Your own population doesn't have their own military.

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 1 points 2 weeks ago

it would be very dangerous politically

sobs in westerners still not understanding anything