OpenSourceGames

2555 readers

1 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

charlieg@lemmy.ml

Elouin@lemmy.ml

poVoq

-21

Minetest rejects another federation suggestion AGAIN. (github.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org to c/opensourcegames@lemmy.ml

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Pure walled-garden behavior from the Minetest devs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mlfh@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The feature request includes the phrase "Behind the scenes there would need to be some cryptographic magic," because it's just yet another "I have a sweet idea for an app, bro, I just need you to do the coding for me" pitch.

The project has 766 contributors with pull requests being accepted all the time. That's not a walled garden.

[–] hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org -5 points 2 weeks ago

What I meant by "walled garden" is about federation and not commits, like look at the Signal app federation situation, they rejeted it because it might be confused with cyptocurrency, which I did hate because of its volatility