this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
483 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2382 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 134 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That would be awesome. We should give them statehood in return.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah, but then they'd have to start paying federal income taxes. That's a big part of why their statehood referendums are always so close, it's a legit pros and cons list.

Last time "yes" did win by just a few percentage points though.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The citizens do seem to be split between the choices, and in the end it is and should be up to them. I find it not surprising that the biggest reason for opposition outside PR is because it would change the balance of senators. Which is rich, since Congress as a whole needs a revamp in representation count in the House anyway, but we've held to an outdated number because it's "hard" to change.

I read there's another possible option - go back under Spanish governance. I wonder how much support that even gets, or if Spain would even want it.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There is another option, it's independence. That third camp is not as popular but it's full of the most romantic of the boriquas

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well to be fair, at least the UK had representation in the EU.

Also, obviously, they'd call it "Prexit"

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So if I moved to Puerto Rico I wouldn't have to pay income tax?

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Partially.

https://www.eisneramper.com/insights/tax/puerto-rico-tax-0321/

Short answer is no on income from Puerto Rican sources or capital gains, few others.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well, Kentucky takes all of our tax money including most republican states