Asklemmy

43885 readers

1289 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Did the recent Linux drama change your views on how you perceived Open Source projects? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

121 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I for one am going through quite a culture shock. I always assumed the nature of FOSS software made it immune to be confined within the policies of nations; I guess if one day the government of USA starts to think that its a security concers for china to use and contribute to core opensource software created by its citizens or based in their boundaries, they might strongarm FOSS communities and projects to make their software exclude them in someway or worse declare GPL software a threat to national security.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For additional context, this was not a choice, but a requirement. The Linux Foundation is US based, and Torvalds is a US citizen. This was required due to current US sanctions against Russia, and was not just some sort of "Russia bad" thing from Torvalds that a lot of people are framing it as.

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

and was not just some sort of "Russia bad" thing from Torvalds

The way he announced it and responded to the critics very much made it seem like that. He legitimately needs to shut the fuck up and get a PR person to talk in his stead.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

this was not a choice, but a requirement

It has been framed as such, but no evidence has been given that it was a requirement