Drivers passing through San Francisco have a new roadside distraction to consider: billboards calling out businesses that don't cough up for the open source code that they use.

The signs are the work of the Open Source Pledge – a group that launched earlier this month. It asks businesses that make use of open source code to pledge $2,000 per developer to support projects that develop the code. So far, 25 companies have signed up – but project co-founder Chad Whitacre wants bigger firms to pay their dues, too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Which licence is open source but demands payment from companies if they use it?

[–] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There are licenses that allow for free non-commercial/personal use but paid business use.

[–] jeinzi@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Do you have an example? I am pretty sure that a FOSS license which requires companies to pay is impossible.

Open Source guarantees that anyone can give the software to a company for free:

"The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale."

And it guarantees that the company can then use it freely:

"The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business [...]"

Quotes from the Open Source Definition.

[–] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 4 points 3 days ago

Sorry, you may be right; I was just thinking of licensing in general.

[–] jeinzi@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 days ago

None. Those things are incompatible with each other.