this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
967 points (98.8% liked)

196

16384 readers
2615 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disrupted@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)

kinda makes you think. billionaires should not exist.

[–] jalkasieni@sopuli.xyz 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Virtually everyone fails to grasp exactly how large of a number a billion is. It’s so, so much bigger than the ”very big number” people think of when they hear the word.

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

The difference between one million and one billion is roughly one billion.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A million seconds is a little over 11 days.

A billion seconds is a little over 31 years.

Billionaires should be required to count out their dollars individually every few days.

[–] TastyWheat@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

While having someone scream random numbers at them as they count. Fuck em!

[–] skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if world class mathematicians have a much better grasp of it — and yet fail to use their expertise to point out the absurdity of the current wealth inequality

Or do even they, world class mathematicians, not really ‘grasp’ it in this wildly important and urgent sense.

[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

In my experience mathematicians don't really concern themselves with numbers between 2 and infinity.

100% and, more so, thats not just a billion in cash, of course. Thats a billion dollars worth of stuff that makes you money, that can be sold off for at least a billion, most likely far more.

When people read these valuations, they often think to themselves "surely they can't be worth that much" and they're right. It will always be much, much more. Other than Trump, wealth valuations are always very, very conservative, due to the nature of how they do it, and thats before we get to the fact that they're only estimating their wealth on the assets that are publicly disclosed.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 0 points 21 hours ago